GeneralDiomedes wrote:
I think they need a good, respected producer to tell them what needs to be changed (things like 0.25 seconds of guitars blasting out of nowhere).
That's the biggest drawback of the demo for me. Sure, it's a demo, but there are some annoying quality of sound issues here. Had this been an official label release, I would have ripped it in the review for the sound quality.
Of course, the so-so MP3 files on their site don't make the already questionable sound quality any better.
The sound is very thin due to the mixing of the bass. That was also a problem on their first demo. The vocals sound like they were recorded in someone's basement (not in a sound box), and then not so carefully layered on top of the music. As a result, the vox have a weird echo effect (like singing in an empty, small bedroom), and sound very disjointed from the music. However, I really tried to listen through that, and could tell the singer's voice is actually very good. Also, I do like the arrangements and the guitar work.
Without a doubt, the band has some work to do in order to make this a sellable piece of work. I would be curious to hear what they could do with a proper recording budget/studio, and the guidance of a producer.