Slayer Of Kings wrote:
Deathkvlt, you obviously fail to get the point. How can 300 years not engage you?
Is the sheer notion of a musical performance going on long after you and your children and grandchildren have died, not intriguing? If you plan of going there every time a new element is added, even the slightest shift with months inbetween, the prospect will continue to exist in the back of your mind. And that, darling, is engaging.
It's an interesting concept, but I wouldn't consider it engaging, I mean, if I'm not able to be there when the new element is added I would't enjoy it. I mean, Sunn O))) works for me because I am there listening to the music (and even maybe in a trance-like state) during the whole of it's performance.
For example... I trust you know the song Sargeist by the band with the same name. You start listening to the song and in the one minute mark you go away for a while and leave the song running. Then you come back halfway through that killer riff that starts around the 1:38 mark. You would have missed all the build up which adds power to the riff and builds atmosphere, not to mention half of the riff per se. Even if you know the riff and can imagine it perfectly the effect isn't close to the same.
Well, I guess the same happens here, if you do periodic visits to the place where this "piece" is playing, then you will loose atmosphere and even the music execution, even if it's running in teh back of your brain (plus a single chord played for a complete year has nothing exciting IMO). Music that can't be heard, can't be enjoyed.
It's an interesting concept, yes, but it fails.
Not flaming, just discusing OK man.