Metal Reviews

homosexuality is not a taboo in australia. in fact every year in sydney poofs (the ones that aren't in jail) have a parade to show off how proud they are to be gay. that doesnt mean that we are 'just as gay'. it is a matter of mathematics. australia has 20 million people, the US 300 million and ive forgotten britain (sorry). The US and britain because they have larger populations would have larger gay populations

it seems all the posts about novak being rammed seem to be implying that every one in jail is a massive gay (and not the pink manicure kind) or is strait but is too small to defend themselves. this is illogical. if all massive crims were gay wouldn't there be some sort of psycho-analysis and we could just put away all the massive gays? there would be no crime. again as i stated before the only homosexuality that occurs is aussie prisons is in sex offenders sections. plus if any one was curious the fear of AIDS would stop most. and as i said anyone who makes it known they are gay do not last long. aussie redneck bogans populate aussie prisons, they have right wing values and usually have iq's under 80

Just because neighbours have a story line about 2 hot chicks kissing doesn't mean it represents aussie culture. just like abfab doesn't represent pommie culture or the cosby's represent african american culture. australian lesbians are usually mistaken for men

that is what was crap about the party, they were all upper middle class snobs and wouldn't look at you unless you rake in $100,000 a year. and as i said he didn't say anything. i agree parties can be shit. this one was. there isn't much time for novak to have (im guessing that is what you meant by start, not start a political party) a party, and the only fans novak would have are idiot goths and satanists who only belive in pain and suffering and the antichrist. if novak were to have a party with them, he would be up for murder next!

We have gay pride marches here too. And getting buttfucked in prison is nothing to do with being gay, it's about power, as The Big Fucking V. said earlier.

As for the Australian lesbians being mistaken for men, must be all that shitty Foster's piss they have to drink.

I wasn't referring to you as a tool, imbacile or inane. in fact i belive i called you intelligent, which i assume is the opposite of imbacile. his first post was many things, because he was responding to the critisicms on this post. though i bet none of you ever assumed that the topic of your criticisms would actually read them and respond. so if i can continue being a school child for another second...u started it. Rio and sum other guy (on page 2) would quote you then type Go V or good to see you V, like a weary warrior would welcome fresh reinforcements. if you wish to see yourself as a tool go ahead, for i was not implying or suggesting that. If i physically walked into a room with novak and started calling people names, unless alcohol had been consumed people would ignore us, avoid eye contact and hope we go away. if they wanted to give us some 'heat', well we would put our money where our mouth is



I don't know what school you went to, but at the schools i attended we argued primarily with out fists

So you wished to start a meaningful conversation with novak with both of you agreeing on major principles (the main objection is you disagreeing burning a church would achieve anything) without declaring at least some sort of unspoken truce. i believe that when you asked to discuss things with novak and saying that you two share common beliefs and let bygones be bygones, it implies a sort of truce during negotiations. Because to ignore the past a clean slate has to exist between the 2 parties. this is done by truce, for a truce ends wars, it doesn't always declare a winner and loser, if that is what you are afraid of being labelled as, a loser.

Also after you said let the past be in the past and you agree with some of novak's beliefs i did notice many people also swing into novak's favour, which would support my repsonse to your first point. you can be modest if you wish, but you weild influence on this forum.



That still doesn't answer my question. what will you do if novak ignores your (believed) warrented suggestion to learn manners, and also if he has to learn manners, it implys he has none at this moment



I never claimed to be novak's mouthpiece, nor did i think i gave off that impression. i would like to clarify that...now

What is so powerful and dominating about something real men go out of their way to beat up? perhaps in prisons over seas this is the case. but in australian prisons the domination and power continues from the domination and power someone weilded on the outside. they bring it to the inside. also they bring respect. if someone isn't respected, it doesn't matter how much domination and power they had on the outside, they will get beaten or stabbed. having sex with another prisoner is a great way to lose respect in australian prisons, becuase most aussie prisoners grew up in the 60's and 70's when gays were seen as subhumans. these prisoners still see them as subhumans, however with this new metrosexuality and tolerence we are being brought up on, your domination and power thing because you play hide the salami in the dirt path may become a reality in a couple of decades

Novak never recanted. he aplogised for somethings, like being caught. so his latest saga of drama is not a sign of weakness.

If novak stayed true to his actions and his beliefs (though according to the above he can't do both, as he can stay loyal to his actions OR stand by his beliefs), he wouldn't take it like a man. he would fight to the death, than be jabed in the ass.

So novak lost credibility because you thought he apologsed? this implys he had credibility. also he lost credibility in your eyes anyway, for you do not speak for the billions on this planet. this means you gave him credit. i hope he is once again credible in your eyes, for you know he hasn't apologised. in case novak ever actually contemplates apologising, im sure he wont, soley for the reason you will think less of him. though apologising would give him credit in the eyes of the judge

PS where did you hear/read all this crap about novak apologising? can you please post a link if possible, thanks. it would be of great help to know what crap has been written so i or novak can clarify it.



It's great you have chosen this name, your not so modest after all

apologies about that mix up with the gay thing. i just clarified it in my previous post. no aussie drinks fosters, for the reason it tastes like british beer...warm piss. aussies drink their beer cold. there is no national beer, it depends on the state you live in (as in the political subdivision, not a state of mind) that dictates what beer you drink. so it would be 7 shitty (insert name of beer) piss that we drink for every lesbian in the country to look like men, or you are in denial that all lesbains are not 36-DD blonde porn stars. i hate to break the reality to you. my condolences

No, needlessly was meant to be needlessly. What is it with you and your buddy trying to correct everyone's grammar. I said it to him, and I'll say it to you. This isn't fucking English class, so cut that shit out. Nobody cares. I understand you sticking up for your friend, and I would do the same. What I mean by needless is that, correct me if I'm wrong, the person you called a "fucking idiot" said nothing negative about your friend. If they're post is factually incorrect, then tell them. Your first post in this forum was a NEEDLESS flame. Its not like your friend is without blame, in effect he started the flame war. If you want to get all fucking technical, no this is not a conversation. How about an electronic exchange of thoughts and ideas, would that work for you smartass? Finally, I realize this online exchange of thoughts and ideas is not completely civil, hence the (mostly).

What is it with you and these battle metaphors? People were saying "good to see you V" and the like because it was thought that he permanently left this forum. Rio said "Go V" for the same fucking reason you would say "Go Desolitary". Do you think we're afraid of your church-burning buddy? You act like we all made comments about him hoping he would never see them. Point out to me where one person backed down when Desolitary started posting, then your opinion may possibly hold water. I think you need to humble yourself. Your self-promoting bullshit is really wearing thin.

And the saga continues...
A serious question: what the hell is your point?
On next weeks episode: the real novak replies, so hang on to your seats, boys and girls.
V.

= unintentionally hilarious post of the year. "unless alcohol had been consumed...", ha! Sounds like you're the local Bad Boys.

True British beer is ale, the drink of the gods, not shitty lager.

And as for getting butt-fucked, go rent the film American History X, when Ed Norton gets raped, he is held down by about six people, so the same could happen to your drinking buddy.

@ Valefor: Yeah, I can't wait! :roll:

I wasn't trying to correct any grammer, i would be quite the hypocrite if i did that. look at my own, it is quite atrocious. it is just that i was confused on heedlesly and needlessly, for they both have similar meanings and i don't know which u meant to say (type).

I still disagree that novak started the flame war, (as can be seen by my many posts) thanks for geting f**king technical. i like ur definition. though i disagree about the mostly, i would say barely

if i made that person who thought the reign ended with robispierre cry by using the words fucking idiot, there there, there there. is that better? i had just been reading all the posts and i felt angry, using swear words is a great way to release anger. once again there there, there there.

I don't know why i am using these battle metaphors. (though a quick glance at this forum shows im not the only one, with a forum subtitle being valhalla, and the threads underneath having names such as warriors) i guess it is because there was a battle of wills on the battlefield that is this thread, and my subconscience id conjured these metaphrs for me to better understand it.

i now know the reason why you were all so happy to see Big V post. i did not know at the time that he had not posted for a while and u guys thought he left the forum and had therefore severed your connection with him, and because he doesn't call, he doesn't write, you feel rejected. I did find a post by zasterboombox in "what way do you vote" where he says we all swear allegience to Big V after we start the big fucking V (BFV?) club, which implies otherwise

i doubt rio would say 'go V' for the same reason I would say 'go Desolatory, because the only time i would say that is if he were running the 100m sprint (which he would never do, for him its the 2.4km or nothing). as i said i doubt rio would say go V for because he was doing the 100m sprint. this is the internet, no physical work required

I doubt you guys are afraid of novak, unless of course he was pointing a loaded .22 at your head, but you would be afraid of anyone if they were doing that.

I act like you all made comments, never expecting him to see them not hoping. how many criminals go out of their way to browse the internet looking for forums that are discussing him? i can't think of any apart from novak. No one backed down when he started posting that i can think of off the top of my head.

I 'need' to humble myself? thanks for the tip. both Big V and novak would disagree with that statement however, as it would turn me into a sheep etc. one of the reasons novak hates the church is that it tries to make people humble. personally i belive the only things i need are clothing, shelter, food, water and sleep.

The god(s) must like squeezing a camels bladder like a sponge and trying to lap up what ever the hell is inside. plus your weather is too cold, you need beer to warm you up. we are the opposite our weather is perfect and sunny and after work we need something to cool us down (though shit is not cold).

ive seen american history x, so what? it happened in a USA prison. my point still stands. yes novak may get passed around like heroin addicts passing around a needle, he may one day win the lottery, he may become the next mike tyson but most probably he will not become any of these, and he most probably wont be raped for the reasons i have already stated.

I really don't care if you made that person cry or not. I was simply supporting my reasons for saying you deserved to have some flame thrown back your way. Way to be a condescending prick with the "there there". If there is anybody who understands the value of swear words to release anger, its me. I am just saying that it was your FIRST post. People aren't going to take you too seriously when you come in right off the bat with that crap. That is all I am trying to get across to you. Also, its fine if you want to think your friend was an innocent bystander, I simply disagree to a point, that's all.

I really don't mind battle metaphors, I just think yours suffer from massive hyperbole. Of course no one expected your friend to see these posts, but that doesn't mean we're afraid of him, which I felt was implied by your posts. If that was not your intent, my apologies. OK, once again you're getting technical with "100m dash" rant. Maybe you would write something to the effect of "Tell 'em Novak" or whatever. My point is that you would be, in a sense, backing up your guy, which you are obviously very willing to do, as I would be for my friends. I don't mean humble in the same way you took it. I mean that your posts come off as overly high-and-mighty, which many people, including myself, get very tired of very quickly.

Also, you're reading way too much into zadster's V fanclub post. There is a great deal of joking around that goes on in these forums, and you would be best served to take what you read with a grain of salt.

What the fuck are you all talking about!? Just cut the crap and discuss something meaningful, you look like a bunch of mierenneukers. "He says Novak is getting his ass raped", "But he uses too many metaphores!" BOOOHOOOHOOO :cry:


:roll:

Easy on the oddball Dutch namecalling. What exactly are mierenneukers? I'm not entirely sure I want to know. I feel I was mischaracterized by your post, but oh well. I'd say that there have been probably five meaningful posts in the span of these nine pages. Come on, you know how this all goes. Meaningless post wars can drag on for an eternity.

Besides, they can be enjoyable, present example excluded.

You have not been around for long enough to know that I am THE ALMIGHTY MEANINGLESS POST MACHINE 8)

And mierenneuken means antfuckery means nitpickery.

I see, antfuckery. I shall have to use this in the future. If you don't mind. How is it pronounced?

You're correct, I haven't been around very long, but its fun to pretend.

miereneukerij , that's been a while since i heard that one again

anyways,i like kommaneukerij better, it sounds more intelligent

What an odd thing to say.