Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:09 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 6
  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next   

Board index » Valhalla » True Metal Warriors
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Holy_Terror
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:49 pm
Posts: 2507
Location: Michigan
Well lets be fair here, Painkiller revolutionized nothing. It was merely an attempt by Judas Priest to match current output by bands like Running Wild, Helloween, and Gamma Ray.

The 80's albums didnt even have the same impact on music that the 70's material did. Technically they were just rehashing all their ideas from the 70;s. The 70's era did not put out a single bad album, some would say Rocka Rolla, but they are wrong. The 80's saw such wonderful albums as Point of Entry, Turbo, and Ram it Down.....so, 70's is better. There I win.
Top
 Profile  
 
DevotedWalnut
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:18 pm 
Offline
The Commish
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 14920
Location: CAVEMAN
70's Priest is much better.
Top
 Profile  
 
Lucifer's Son
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:52 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 2016
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?
Top
 Profile  
 
DevotedWalnut
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
The Commish
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 14920
Location: CAVEMAN
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?
Top
 Profile  
 
Lucifer's Son
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 2016
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.
Top
 Profile  
 
DevotedWalnut
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:56 pm 
Offline
The Commish
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 14920
Location: CAVEMAN
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.
Top
 Profile  
 
Lucifer's Son
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:59 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 2016
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.

Agreed.
I just wanted you to eleborate... :wink:
Top
 Profile  
 
Metalhead_Bastard
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:25 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:46 pm
Posts: 4316
Location: England
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.
Top
 Profile  
 
DevotedWalnut
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline
The Commish
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 14920
Location: CAVEMAN
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?
Top
 Profile  
 
Metalhead_Bastard
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:33 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:46 pm
Posts: 4316
Location: England
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Evil Dead
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:45 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Where Dark and Light Don't Differ
I like 70's and 80's Priest equally. In fact, I love anything Priest. Even teh Ripper years. Demolition is one of my favorite Priest albums.
Top
 Profile  
 
noodles
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:02 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Beyond the Realms of Death
Victim of Changes
Dream Deceiver/Deceiver
Top
 Profile  
 
DevotedWalnut
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:38 am 
Offline
The Commish
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 14920
Location: CAVEMAN
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.


I'm not saying it is thrash. Just an early thrash riff.
Top
 Profile  
 
Caligula_K
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:37 am 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 3561
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.


I'm not saying it is thrash. Just an early thrash riff.


Exactly. And riffs like this form the basis for the thrash genre, along with stuff like Dissident Aggressor and Tyrant.
Top
 Profile  
 
Jarkale
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:44 am 
Offline
Svartalfar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:21 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Somewhere in Time
1. The Sentinel
2. Beyond the Realms of Death
3. Painkiller or Freewheel Burning... Cannot decide... :huh:
Top
 Profile  
 
DeathBomb
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:21 pm 
Offline
Svartalfar

Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:30 am
Posts: 47
In no particular order:

Victim of Changes
Beyond the Realms of Death
Tyrant
Top
 Profile  
 
bucketofheads
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:18 am 
Offline
Svartalfar

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 10:57 pm
Posts: 31
Location: cincinnati, ohio
painkiller

tyrant

nightcrawler
Top
 Profile  
 
Metalhead_Bastard
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:20 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:46 pm
Posts: 4316
Location: England
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.


I'm not saying it is thrash. Just an early thrash riff.


"Or an early form of thrash metal?"
:unsure:
Top
 Profile  
 
The Evil Dead
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:50 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:45 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Where Dark and Light Don't Differ
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.


I'm not saying it is thrash. Just an early thrash riff.


"Or an early form of thrash metal?"
:unsure:


Just felt like quoting this to keep the chain going. Wat happenz when we hit 100?
Top
 Profile  
 
Lucifer's Son
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:08 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 2016
The Evil Dead wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Metalhead_Bastard wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Lucifer's Son wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
70's Priest is much better.

Why?


Why not?

Explain.


I think 70's Priest is better because it has more substance. It has more soul. It is original. It is awesome. Whether it's upbeat and fast or slow and kinda dark, it's all awesome. Not all of Priest's songs from the 70's are awesome. But from Rocka Rolla to Killing Machine, they are all classics. Can't say the same for the 80's stuff. And the 90's stuff is too limitited.

Again this is all IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLYOrgOwaM

this songs says its all.


The riff after 3:15 makes me think of Whole Lotta Love.


Or an early form of thrash metal?


Meh, I always think people are talking shit when they go "omg! Early thrash!" just because a riff has extended palm muted bits. Obviously it is to an extent true, but it still sin't thrash. Symptom of the Universe for example, definantly an early thrash riff (the first in fact, or so I believe) but it isn't early thrash.


I'm not saying it is thrash. Just an early thrash riff.


"Or an early form of thrash metal?"
:unsure:


Just felt like quoting this to keep the chain going. Wat happenz when we hit 100?

We've had this before, it's quite beautiful... :)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 6
  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next   

Board index » Valhalla » True Metal Warriors


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group