Goat wrote:
Satan's Anus wrote:
I'm sure it's no surprise that I dig this album. That said, Zad, you should never have reviewed this in the first place. It's clear that you are very biased when it comes to this band. Reviews should be about ranting.
But I'm sure I've said such things here long ago. Static-X are still around, survivors of an era of music that is universally trashed these days, much like 80s rock was in the 90s. That speaks volumes. Static-X has a very large fan base, and those fans will really dig this album (despite it's sort of "soft" guitar tone). That's what matters.
Not sure what your problem is, then, if reviews should be about ranting!

I mentioned their fanbase in the review; alas, a large fanbase is not something to base a musical recommendation off. You have to admit that this album is much more dull that their last; heck, if I ever can be bothered, I'll review Wisconsin Death Trip and give it at least a 70. It's not about being biased; I like their good songs. Unfortunately for Static-X, they have very few.
Curse the elusive contraction!
I'll agree that this album isn't as good as the last, or their best, but as a fan of this band, it is far from bad. It's a good album.
And a large fan base shouldn't be used as a recommendation point, but it is telling. Objectivity is a reviewers greatest tool. If a reviewer starts in on the "a million people
can be wrong" stuff, then they're writing from the wrong perspective. Not saying you necessarily did that here, of course, but it's close. And no one can do the "a million people
can't be wrong" stuff, either. I think that's a stronger viewpoint, but you still can't use it.
You have to write for both sides. What's good about this album, Zad? Nothing? There's nothing positive about this review. And surely the album isn't that bad. Your review focuses only on the negative. That's where it starts and that's where it stays and ends. When you focus on (i.e. don't mock) the positive aspects of an album—and 99.9% of albums have them—you'll find that the pros lend credibility to the cons. Without that balance, it just sounds like trash-talk, for lack of a better term.
You sure you missed me?

I promise, I won't be posting that much.