Tale wrote:
Chris, i've been following metal reviews for so many years, and from all the reviewers you are the one that is almost my musical mirror.
Dont you think 88 is a little bit underrated?
Its a 97 for me, almost at the same level as metal opera and scarecrow.
Hi,
To tell you the truth it was difficult to quote. At first listens my intention was 95-97 / 100... but with subsequent listens and also while listening other really strong release in parallels, I decided this wasn't worth more than 90, and settled to 88 as I think it's a strong enough score. Yes quality wise it's near Metal Opera / Scarecrow but it lacks some punch IMHO.
I very often get pointed out to be too emotional with my quoting and over quoting everything. So it wasn't a simple album to quote. One thing makes me think that I've made the right choice is that since the review I haven't spinned the album once. If it was a true 95-97 in my heart, that wouldn't have happened.
But time will tell, I admit that when I gave Mandrake 89 / 100 I thought it was the right quote, years later I realised that I was off the mark and it really is a 95 / 100 album.
I found Tolkki's Avalon (I should have a review soon) to be a little superior or at the very least on par with Mysteries.
I'm glad we have similar taste. You may want to check out Tolkki's Avalon & Battle Beast new album, the later wipes the floor with everything I've heard this year

(Nightwish + Sonata meets AC/DC & UDO), this Avantasia included. Currently running in a loop on my ipod, and unlikely to be pushed any time soon.
Thanks
Chris