Cú Chulainn wrote:
The Daily Mail is full of shit.
http://maptube.org/map.aspx?m=ol&s=bBHF ... 9_1514.kmlThe poorer areas have the worst rioting. I realise that a lot of these people out there are scum and just out for the looting, but there's a reason and a context as to why they're rioting, and it's not "liberal faggotry" or anything like that. It's what the English do, 30 years of inequality, of hanging on in quiet desperation, and then boom, it boils over. Cameron's taken away these people's hopes, their benefits, their job opportunities, their healthcare and their academic chances. A general feeling of resentment is understandable, even if most of the rioters have no fucking clue about politics and are going about this "protesting" business entirely the wrong way.
If it has been "30 years of inequality, of hanging on in quiet desperation", how is it Camerons fault? Sorry, but that is nothing but more of the same "your side's to blame! Nuh uh,
your side is!" hackery. So the government is supposed to shelter, clothe and feed everyone? And supply them with toys? Sounds like the type of relationship that exists between parents and their children.
In fact that is exactly how these idiots are behaving; like spoiled children in the midst of a temper tantrum because their parents are running short on money.
Herein lies the problem; when a culture of government dependence is created and perpetuated, it creates the mindset of entitlement, and at some point, what with continous immigration, the global economy divebombing and so forth, it is going to become untenable.
So what is to be done?
Why, burn it all down, of course... and then demand that the government rebuild it. Sounds logical to me.
It would be funny if it wasn't so fucking pathetic.
Kids, pay attention; this is a living case for self sufficiency and self reliance. And why the government's role should not be all encompassing.