Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 4:01 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:05 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
traptunderice wrote:
Whatever. The fact that you can't distinguish prejudices from oppression then I'm not having this argument. Being prejudiced towards people you don't know is rational. Being prejudiced towards someone because they are black is irrational.


Actually prejudice to people who look different is logical. If they look different they must be from somewhere else and hence a threat to your turf.

Very animalistic of course and not really applicable in a modern society.

But so many societies are not modern by any stretch of the imagination - they're insular.

traptunderice wrote:
These types of prejudices are constructed. Prejudices towards others is natural; we develop them as children until we recognize others outside our family as trustworthy. But that's fine.


I agree especially when it comes to constructed prejudices in terms of gender or sexuality.




traptunderice wrote:

Conspiracy theories!? Bitch, all I do is social science. Sociology minor and philosophy major! Social values and moral codes? That's my field. Where the fuck do you think I get this shit? Marx, EP Thompson, Weber, Hill Collins, I'm not messing around. This is science.


Actually I've got two degrees: Commerce with majors in finance and international business and Arts with major in Political Science and minors in Sociology and History. We did plenty of Marx, Thompson etc.

The one thing I learned is it's not real science. Real science is predictive (e.g. laws of physics or chemistry). Social sciences are fuzzy theories often based on extremely unrealistic assumptions.

Basically social scientists play in fantasy land outside of the real world.

It's a case of the old Arabic saying: "A dog barks but the caravan moves on."

traptunderice wrote:

Don't equate PC multiculturalism to actual acceptance of difference. GTFO with this notion that attempting to reach a point in society where we respect human beings as human beings is comparable to totalitarianism.



Your definition of acceptance of difference seems to be based on wealth distribution.



traptunderice wrote:


If anything, what you have claimed as showing that you are so free, and this is what you really should respond to because the other points are trivial and you're too ignorant to concede, your freedom founded in your car, decent paying job, total lack of voice in politics insofar as your country wages war across the globe and you have no say in it, that freedom is the same kind of freedom that all of the Oceanians claimed to have in 1984. "I have a home, I have a wife and 2.3 children, all I have to do is upturn my gaze from all the awful things that happen in this world and my country has to be perpetually in the process of conquering the globe so that the wheels stay on the machine and I'm fine with that because we live in Western civilization". Keep your freedom and shove it while I try to undermine it and the civilization that perpetuates it. I want you to feel uncomfortable, I want you to come face to face with the woman who stitches the shirt that rests on your back who won't see her family ever again and hasn't since she was 14 and who will die of some banal sickness which could've been treated but wasn't and was fostered by the awful conditions she lived in cramped with the other workers. You say that's how the world works; I don't want your world. I want to burn it down and give it back to the people who built it in the first place and who you sit atop of each and everyday.


Firstly you don't make me uncomfortable. I always find idealists amusing in a sad kind of way.

Secondly when it comes down to it, my fellow "Oceanians" and I don't give a fuck about others too much.

Some of us pretend to, but then buy clothes made in sweatshops or consumer electronics and cars produced by poorly paid exploited workers in 3rd world countries.

We pretend to be environmental and then drive big gas guzzling SUVs etc. We state we're against war but then don't do anything to voice our concerns.

We don't change our habits for ideals.

We're not oppressed. Quite the opposite. We are liberated and self serving individuals focusing on the most important things in the world: ourselves, our families and our own little worlds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
dead1 wrote:
stevelovesmoonspell wrote:
In his defense I'm fairly certain he's only referring to economics.


Again historical comparisons are appropriate - gays and women in the Western world now have more rights than they ever did.


Please explain to me how the poor have more rights than ever. Either in buying power to express their voices economically or Politically.

I really don't want to get into it because you will just say it's a conspiracy theory despite the evidence, but the average lower-middle class and worse have absolutely no political voice.

Planting cops to warrant arrests during demonstrations is one of the most unamerican and oppressive things ever to happen. To me this is TREASON because the constitution guarantees the right to protest and police and the gov. conspiring to stop it is CRIMINAL.

when Obama decided that his predacessors were not war criminals is the day freedom died for me.

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:01 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
dead1 wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
Whatever. The fact that you can't distinguish prejudices from oppression then I'm not having this argument. Being prejudiced towards people you don't know is rational. Being prejudiced towards someone because they are black is irrational.


Actually prejudice to people who look different is logical. If they look different they must be from somewhere else and hence a threat to your turf.

Very animalistic of course and not really applicable in a modern society.

But so many societies are not modern by any stretch of the imagination - they're insular.
This isn't rational. People look different all the time and you point to that as being characteristic of modern society. So you're alluding to pre-modern, possibly pre-civilization, your use of "animalistic" makes me think you're acting as if it's instinctual. I don't want to pin you as doing sociobiology but that is bunk. Society shapes who we are cautious towards.
Quote:
traptunderice wrote:
Conspiracy theories!? Bitch, all I do is social science. Sociology minor and philosophy major! Social values and moral codes? That's my field. Where the fuck do you think I get this shit? Marx, EP Thompson, Weber, Hill Collins, I'm not messing around. This is science.
Actually I've got two degrees: Commerce with majors in finance and international business and Arts with major in Political Science and minors in Sociology and History. We did plenty of Marx, Thompson etc.

The one thing I learned is it's not real science. Real science is predictive (e.g. laws of physics or chemistry). Social sciences are fuzzy theories often based on extremely unrealistic assumptions.
Your "hard sciences" are only predictive within the systems which they've constructed. Latour, Kuhn, Feyeraband, all point to science as only doing what science has structured itself to do. Yeah, it provides us with information but it can't really ever reach what we idealistically think they are doing. Social science can still provide data and accounts of the world as it is in a structured, non-anecdotal form. Is that not all science is?
Quote:
Basically social scientists play in fantasy land outside of the real world.
For serious? All anyone does is play in fantasy land.
Quote:
traptunderice wrote:
Don't equate PC multiculturalism to actual acceptance of difference. GTFO with this notion that attempting to reach a point in society where we respect human beings as human beings is comparable to totalitarianism.

Your definition of acceptance of difference seems to be based on wealth distribution.
I never once have mentioned wealth redistribution. Quote me on it.

Quote:
traptunderice wrote:
If anything, what you have claimed as showing that you are so free, and this is what you really should respond to because the other points are trivial and you're too ignorant to concede, your freedom founded in your car, decent paying job, total lack of voice in politics insofar as your country wages war across the globe and you have no say in it, that freedom is the same kind of freedom that all of the Oceanians claimed to have in 1984. "I have a home, I have a wife and 2.3 children, all I have to do is upturn my gaze from all the awful things that happen in this world and my country has to be perpetually in the process of conquering the globe so that the wheels stay on the machine and I'm fine with that because we live in Western civilization". Keep your freedom and shove it while I try to undermine it and the civilization that perpetuates it. I want you to feel uncomfortable, I want you to come face to face with the woman who stitches the shirt that rests on your back who won't see her family ever again and hasn't since she was 14 and who will die of some banal sickness which could've been treated but wasn't and was fostered by the awful conditions she lived in cramped with the other workers. You say that's how the world works; I don't want your world. I want to burn it down and give it back to the people who built it in the first place and who you sit atop of each and everyday.


Firstly you don't make me uncomfortable. I always find idealists amusing in a sad kind of way.

Secondly when it comes down to it, my fellow "Oceanians" and I don't give a fuck about others too much.

Some of us pretend to, but then buy clothes made in sweatshops or consumer electronics and cars produced by poorly paid exploited workers in 3rd world countries.

We pretend to be environmental and then drive big gas guzzling SUVs etc. We state we're against war but then don't do anything to voice our concerns.

We don't change our habits for ideals.

We're not oppressed. Quite the opposite. We are liberated and self serving individuals focusing on the most important things in the world: ourselves, our families and our own little worlds.
[/quote] This is actually what Orwell predicted. Dear fucking god I am agreeing with Adveser because you are just that ridiculous. Marcuse's happy consciousness right there.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:12 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
Adveser wrote:
Please explain to me how the poor have more rights than ever. Either in buying power to express their voices economically or Politically.


Economically - here in Australia they get just about everything heavily discounted included housing, medical and education.

Politically - the government listens to them and plies them with the one thing they want - free services and cash.


Adveser wrote:

but the average lower-middle class and worse have absolutely no political voice.


And like they care about this?

Most people I know have no interest in politics whatsoever. Most of them don't even know who the Prime Minister is or how government works. Many of these people were University educated.

Australians at least are an apolitical bunch - they don't think about politics too much. Basically they get on with life.

They don't like taxes but like lots of government services and that's it. A lot of them vote based on what their family votes or whose promised them the most in terms of tax breaks, services etc (pork barrelling)

This is why both major political parties are very similar in terms of ideology and policies (or lackthereof).



And besides the masses have never truly had a political voice. According to people thinkers in the past, that would constitute mob rule so every step has been taken to retain true political power in the middle and upper classes.





Adveser wrote:

when Obama decided that his predacessors were not war criminals is the day freedom died for me.



A bit melodramatic!


How can Obama declare his predecessors as war criminals when he himself is leading two dubious wars in Afghanistan and Libya and still hasn't pulled out fully from a third one in Iraq.



And how has this impacted on your freedom? It hasn't.


Last edited by dead1 on Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:27 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
traptunderice wrote:
This is actually what Orwell predicted.


Orwell didn't predict anything.

This is the way it's always been. Since day dot most humans have merely been self serving. They do things that will have what they perceive as positive impacts on their own lives.

They generally don't care about politics or the environment or the plight of others unless it impacts them personally. They never have done.

Basically Rousseau's noble savage is just a fantasy despite left orientated individuals wishing it was true.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:33 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
dead1 wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
This is actually what Orwell predicted.


Orwell didn't predict anything.

This is the way it's always been. Since day dot most humans have merely been self serving. They do things that will have what they perceive as positive impacts on their own lives.

They generally don't care about politics or the environment or the plight of others unless it impacts them personally. They never have done.

Basically Rousseau's noble savage is just a fantasy despite left orientated individuals wishing it was true.
We'll agree to disagree on our assumptions of human nature. As much as Rousseau's was fantasy so was Hobbes'. If humans simply cared for themselves then how does that explain mothers, fathers, families, communities? We agree to a social contract right? No. Shit is bollocks. People work together, people get something out of socializing which isn't purely self interest but a pleasure in acting in concert. I don't comment on this forum for some future gain but I enjoy the act of recognizing myself in a group of others.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:47 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
dead1 wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
Grab a chair next to me, bro! I'm looking forward to further expounding on Keynesian economics!!


Last time I chgecked, Keynesian economics is still what enables people like you and I to live the good life.

Be grateful for it.

Or move to North Korea where it's still all socialist brotherhood.


You are projecting here, pal. I'm old-school fiscally conservative. Like Dwight D. Eisenhower, no Red Defender if I recall correctly. And you really insist on responding to every post, even those not directly addressed to you, don't you?

A last word warrior to the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:47 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
traptunderice wrote:
People work together, people get something out of socializing which isn't purely self interest but a pleasure in acting in concert. I don't comment on this forum for some future gain but I enjoy the act of recognizing myself in a group of others.



Your definition of "self serving" is too limited. Self serving includes companionship, family, community etc - basically anything that creates self-satisfaction or improves sense of self.

Some people get that from doing things for others e.g. Mother Theresa or Princess Diana.

My point here is that people only care about these things that have an impact on their own life and that they're personally involved with.

Most people don't really care about the plight of Libyans or Haitians, or that the shirt they're wearing was made by sweatshop labour in Cambodia or that the politician they helped elect is a corrupt moron.

They only care when it impacts on their lives (hence great opposition to taxes or cutting services).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:48 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
emperorblackdoom wrote:
And you really insist on responding to every post, even those not directly addressed to you, don't you?

A last word warrior to the end.


Beats the current thing I'm supposed to be working on: Fringe Benefit Tax reports. Yawn!

Plus I thought it was directed at me. As every single post here seems to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:58 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
dead1 wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
People work together, people get something out of socializing which isn't purely self interest but a pleasure in acting in concert. I don't comment on this forum for some future gain but I enjoy the act of recognizing myself in a group of others.
Your definition of "self serving" is too limited. Self serving includes companionship, family, community etc - basically anything that creates self-satisfaction or improves sense of self.

Some people get that from doing things for others e.g. Mother Theresa or Princess Diana.

My point here is that people only care about these things that have an impact on their own life and that they're personally involved with.

Most people don't really care about the plight of Libyans or Haitians, or that the shirt they're wearing was made by sweatshop labour in Cambodia or that the politician they helped elect is a corrupt moron.

They only care when it impacts on their lives (hence great opposition to taxes or cutting services).
Your definition of self serving is too limited. The fact that you don't see how what happens in sweatshops affects you is what the left has always pointed to as false consciousness. Interventions come back to bite us in the ass, i.e., Afghanistan and Iraq. You know this. This leads you to advocate non-intervention. However, the economic practices which you support through your promotion of how great it makes our lives is a form of intervention which has been equally if not more destructive than our military excursions which occur in Libya. The world is divided into discrete regions where one can go on without attention to the other. We have shaped them as much as they will shape us and vice versa. But as long as it lasts until your 86 years last then I guess you don't mind because you're self interested. :rolleyes:

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 5:03 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
traptunderice wrote:
Your definition of self serving is too limited. The fact that you don't see how what happens in sweatshops affects you is what the left has always pointed to as false consciousness. Interventions come back to bite us in the ass, i.e., Afghanistan and Iraq. You know this. This leads you to advocate non-intervention. However, the economic practices which you support through your promotion of how great it makes our lives is a form of intervention which has been equally if not more destructive than our military excursions which occur in Libya. The world is divided into discrete regions where one can go on without attention to the other. We have shaped them as much as they will shape us and vice versa. But as long as it lasts until your 86 years last then I guess you don't mind because you're self interested. :rolleyes:


So explain in real life practical terms how a dude making shirts in a sweatshop has any impact on my life, except that of making clothes more affordable?


False conciousness is bullshit. It's basically stating that what people think is wrong and needs to be replaced by the "correct consciousness" whatever that is.

People like Stalin, Hitler and Mao were big on rectifying what they perceived as "false consciousness."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 5:15 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
Back on topic, another article why the West should not have taken sides in this civil war:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/world/wasn+meant+like+this+free+Benghazi/4491771/story.html

Quote:
The young gunmen at the roadblock took no chances. They put a knife to the throat of the driver before hauling the three men and one woman from the car, dragging them through the street into a nearby mosque for a rough round of interrogation.


"They were beaten on their feet and the woman was slapped around the face until she admitted planning an attack on the mosque," said Basim Mohamed, muezzin at Quiche mosque.


Inside the car, they say, they found an AK-47 and 10 cartridges of ammunition.


A frenzied mob formed outside the mosque as word spread that Gaddafi assassins had been cornered. It dispersed only when rebel gunmen arrived to take away the suspects to an uncertain fate.


It wasn't supposed to be like this in free Benghazi. After throwing off the shackles of Gaddafi's rule, Libya's young opposition movement is rounding up suspected opponents and delivering its own brutal form of justice in a city living in fear that it has been penetrated by a fifth column of government loyalists.


Rebel leaders admit that dozens of Gaddafi supporters have been arrested or killed.


Every night, gangs of vigilantes assemble at makeshift roadblocks - made from piles of rubble, oil drums or piping - to control entry and exit from their neighbourhoods.


On Sunday, gunfights echoed around the city as gangs sought to mop up pro-Gaddafi elements after government troops had been beaten back a day previously.


Foreign workers fled the city long ago in fear of being mistaken for a government-hired mercenary.


Many residents are now too frightened to drive through the dark streets at night, fearing a shakedown or worse at the proliferating checkpoints.


"If they don't know who you are, and are in their part of town, and you have a nice car, then they are going to think you are a car thief or they say you are with Gaddafi," said one driver who now stayed close to home after dark.


"Maybe you hesitate or seem nervous and they will think you have something to hide. Not all of them are good people."


The rebel's interim government is made up of professionals, academics, businessmen and lawyers often educated in the U.K. or U.S. who make all the right noises about democracy, human rights and the rule of law. But they are far removed from the excitable volunteers who man roadblocks through the night, stopping cars they believe may have been stolen or dragging suspected Gaddafi loyalists into the street.


Mustafa Gerhiani, the urbane spokesman for the rebels' provisional government in the east, said there were several hundred government supporters in the city who had formed sleeper cells.


"We know where they live and many have been rounded up. There are people looking for them. A lot have been caught and killed," he said.


He added that some had been detained for their own protection and that the revolutionary council did not condone mob justice. "But if they start shooting what can you do?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:05 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
dead1 wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
Your definition of self serving is too limited. The fact that you don't see how what happens in sweatshops affects you is what the left has always pointed to as false consciousness. Interventions come back to bite us in the ass, i.e., Afghanistan and Iraq. You know this. This leads you to advocate non-intervention. However, the economic practices which you support through your promotion of how great it makes our lives is a form of intervention which has been equally if not more destructive than our military excursions which occur in Libya. The world is divided into discrete regions where one can go on without attention to the other. We have shaped them as much as they will shape us and vice versa. But as long as it lasts until your 86 years last then I guess you don't mind because you're self interested. :rolleyes:


So explain in real life practical terms how a dude making shirts in a sweatshop has any impact on my life, except that of making clothes more affordable?


False conciousness is bullshit. It's basically stating that what people think is wrong and needs to be replaced by the "correct consciousness" whatever that is.

People like Stalin, Hitler and Mao were big on rectifying what they perceived as "false consciousness."
False consciousness is people acting against their own interests. Pretty simple if you ask me.

The minuscule wages that he makes undermined the job of someone who undermined the job down the line of the person who lives near the local industry which shut down in your city leaving that person jobless, pushing them onto federal aid or into crime or simply leaving them destitute which could come to impinge on your tax money, your safety, and your property value. If we paid global south workers proper wages they could invest their own economies creating jobs in their own country undermining fundamentalism and creating middle classes to resist dictators and create political empowerment rather than governments ruled by morons and enforced by thugs. As you mention in that article. There simply is no benefit in paying someone dirt poor wages so that we can simply have "stuff" I only really need half the shirts I own. I could've paid the same amount for half those shirts and the workers who made the shirts could've taken home twice their wage, making a vast difference through one's income being doubled.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:54 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:22 am
Posts: 2250
traptunderice wrote:
False consciousness is people acting against their own interests. Pretty simple if you ask me.

The minuscule wages that he makes undermined the job of someone who undermined the job down the line of the person who lives near the local industry which shut down in your city leaving that person jobless, pushing them onto federal aid or into crime or simply leaving them destitute which could come to impinge on your tax money, your safety, and your property value. If we paid global south workers proper wages they could invest their own economies creating jobs in their own country undermining fundamentalism and creating middle classes to resist dictators and create political empowerment rather than governments ruled by morons and enforced by thugs. As you mention in that article. There simply is no benefit in paying someone dirt poor wages so that we can simply have "stuff" I only really need half the shirts I own. I could've paid the same amount for half those shirts and the workers who made the shirts could've taken home twice their wage, making a vast difference through one's income being doubled.


Let's assume you can pay all the Global South workers proper wages (by proper I assume you are talking about western level salaries in terms of Purchasing Power Parity).

You've just wiped out these country's only main source of competitive advantage (cheap labour).

Companies relocate to where the best tax breaks or best infrastructure is.

The Global South workers have become unemployed. So instead of getting a pittance, they get nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:20 am 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:11 am
Posts: 3884
Location: From the sunshine state of Euphoria
Trapt,Adveser and Dead need to be locked in a room with a cattle prod for each of them and let them go at it so this fucking merry go round can end sheesh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:15 am 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:15 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Flanders, Southern Netherlands
So Trapt, do you go shopping for your clothes outside Thai loom workshops? Because if you don't, you're being a tad hypocritical again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:19 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29896
Location: UK
Boo to this thread! I wanted Adveser's mad science theories + .... SATAN! vs Dead1's (b)anal reading of history and instead we get Trapt's Introduction to Commienism, pt 354.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
So Trapt, do you go shopping for your clothes outside Thai loom workshops? Because if you don't, you're being a tad hypocritical again.
I shop at American Apparel. I sacrifice buying into misogyny for non-sweatshop labor. Hypocritical again? Do explain.

I'm sorry I derailed it I just loled at what the two were saying.

Edit: Scratch that. I haven't shopped at American Apparel in a long time actually mainly because of their ad campaigns. I shop at GAP and Banana Republic for my office clothes and they've been deemed friendly to workers as fair trade organizations by some labor sites that I know of, mainly probably due to some backlash I think they faced in the 90s. My band shirts underneath the print may be from sweatshop labor but I can't help that and I'm supporting the musician, a worker, hence tend to buy most at gigs. I wear Levi's and I can't find them labeled as non-sweatshop labor but I have to assume that paying $35 is better than $20 for the worker which is not at all necessarily true but I hope. I've never heard anything outwardly negative about them. Plus I don't have that many pairs of jeans.

And I thought Addy being right about Orwell was fun.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:15 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Flanders, Southern Netherlands
Well Trapt, I see you've been talking about 'creating middle classes' as well. Class struggle ftw.

But, to get this back on topic:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:26 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
Well Trapt, I see you've been talking about 'creating middle classes' as well. Class struggle ftw.
Because god forbid I make arguments which others might agree with. Because god forbid I'd rather have middle classes created and people not be impoverished. Really though?

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group