But we do review NSBM! Kroda, Hate Forest, and Graveland, to give three examples, have all been covered and given high scores where appropriate. I don't think that declining to give the likes of Jewicide any coverage is really going to make the site suffer - we really only reject music that is actually incitement to hatred, which I can't see as being a problem. Metal Archives are a different site, and operate under a different philosophy - one much more comprehensive and encyclopaedic than Metal Reviews'.
We can debate political correctness all day, but if an aim of this site is telling people about how great metal can be, I don't see how that will be helped by reviewing a bunch of hateful loons like Nokturnal Mortum and not telling the reader about their beliefs - consider that if I buy a television, I don't want to buy it from a company that funds far-right hate groups, whether the television has nazi insignia all over it or not. This is a perfectly valid choice of mine, one shared by many, and if people want to apply that to the music they listen to (also a perfectly valid choice, also of a majority) then we as reviewers have a duty to say that yes, this band makes cool metals, but by the way, the drummer hates black people and thinks all Jews should be gassed.
In any case, I pride myself that we have a good enough team of writers at this site to ensure even reviews like
this which feature piss-takery still have more than enough information on the music itself for even the most (b)anal of readers. If you can't cope with a review that takes a smidgeon of piss out of Rob Darken, the problem is yours.