Metastable To Chaos wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the audio on a vinyl is uncompressed which is why the sound is better.
Totally wrong. Vinyl is compressed much more heavily than CD and has very restrictive limitations on the physical frequencies and bandwidth that can be used. All of this is in the name of tracking, which is a problem itself because of the noise and heavy distortion and smearing associated with it.
Vinyl also can not be played back without the RIAA EQ which flattens the frequency response. The music can't be pressed on Vinyl without the frequencies being seriously squashed, only to be reversed. It is something like taking a cassette and recording at half-speed and playing it back at double speed to squeeze a little bit more quality out of the format. They have learned what frequencies the vinyl is good at storing and Re-EQ the whole signal to make up for it.
Analogue is usually colored and distorted, but in a very pleasing way that a great many people prefer and digital, either in music or cicuits, is dead-on accurate but is not as pleasing to the ear.
Vinyl has a lot of complications that digital will never have. Last time I read the wiki page on records, it read like every tonal or sound problem can happen, like if the platter doesn't stamp both channels with the same force, if results in phasey and off-balance sound that will never sound right. They also have poor Frequency response in the low end. Their theoretical limits are almost never pushed, which is why people always claim they have a broader range than digital. They don't where it matters and where our ears place the most importance. Vinyl also has crosstalk problems. This is the number one reason vinyl has that bass heavy sound, because kick drums and bass guitars usually panned down the center get a volume boost that isn't heard in the mastering and mixing stages.