Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:27 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:20 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29895
Location: UK
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:25 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:29 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?
You're assuming they're offering it up. What you call cavorting like a whore, they may see as a solid social bonding venture. Assume they're just craving your dick and that they're only chatting to create some quasi form of connection which they don't even want anyways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:45 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Where Dark and Light Don't Differ
Wow and I thought I was gay for listening to club music.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29895
Location: UK
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.


Hey, if a woman wants to sell herself to put her through college, that's her right. You could see the transaction as more than taking a book out of a library - interesting analogy, actually, since libraries get government funding and you need a membership card. Hm.

Quote:
Wow and I thought I was gay for listening to club music.


Step 1 - admit that there's a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?

Edit: Did this become about strippers?


Last edited by traptunderice on Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?
You're assuming they're offering it up. What you call cavorting like a whore, they may see as a solid social bonding venture. Assume they're just craving your dick and that they're only chatting to create some quasi form of connection which they don't even want anyways.


Far too naive. Come on, how often do you go to clubs?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:45 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Where Dark and Light Don't Differ
I'd be surprised if half of you guys even go out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29895
Location: UK
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.


This is why pimps are needed. Although I'm with you, man, prostitution should totally be legalised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?
You're assuming they're offering it up. What you call cavorting like a whore, they may see as a solid social bonding venture. Assume they're just craving your dick and that they're only chatting to create some quasi form of connection which they don't even want anyways.


Far too naive. Come on, how often do you go to clubs?
How am I naive? I've been to clubs; I'm not a daily peruser. I know women who go to clubs. When they go, they don't go to get fucked; they go to have fun in a social setting with some cardio dancing on the side. The cardio bit is a little tongue-in-cheek. But you're the wise man of whores so I should just respect your authority on the subject, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:38 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
The Evil Dead wrote:
I'd be surprised if half of you guys even go out.


I try, but the clubs here are shit. Lady GaGa, Black Eyed Peas and Europop on constant replay.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:39 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.
I'm not saying they should be protected; they simply shouldn't be the victim of predation when they're looking for a legitimate bond. Women can do what they like with their sexuality; Emma Goldman ftw, but there has to be some form of legitimate audience with no coercive intentions which respects the control of their own sexuality. You're discard the chit chat which they obviously want to participate in since they are doing so is disrespectful.

I'm engaged, work full-time and go to school full-time; I have neither time nor desire to "beat the beats".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?
You're assuming they're offering it up. What you call cavorting like a whore, they may see as a solid social bonding venture. Assume they're just craving your dick and that they're only chatting to create some quasi form of connection which they don't even want anyways.


Far too naive. Come on, how often do you go to clubs?
How am I naive? I've been to clubs; I'm not a daily peruser. I know women who go to clubs. When they go, they don't go to get fucked; they go to have fun in a social setting with some cardio dancing on the side. The cardio bit is a little tongue-in-cheek. But you're the wise man of whores so I should just respect your authority on the subject, no?


I'm not talking about the entire female population of a club. :S
Denying that a sizeable handful of girls there want only to express their sexuality is naive. Assuming that they'd be interesting to talk to is even worse.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.
I'm not saying they should be protected; they simply shouldn't be the victim of predation when they're looking for a legitimate bond. Women can do what they like with their sexuality; Emma Goldman ftw, but there has to be some form of legitimate audience with no coercive intentions which respects the control of their own sexuality. You're discard the chit chat which they obviously want to participate in since they are doing so is disrespectful.

I'm engaged, work full-time and go to school full-time; I have neither time nor desire to "beat the beats".


How is discarding the chit chat coercion? I don't want to talk; if they want to, I leave, I don't ball-gag them and drag them into the bathroom. Jesus.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:45 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not glorifying sexual organs. I'm glorifying the value each individual person has and how they shouldn't be simply exploited to get off. You're assuming way too much about these "club sluts". When you assume a person is a piece of trash as a premise in your argument, I guess it makes sense that you feel like you can just use them however you'd like.


1) They want to offer something.
2) I want to accept the offer.
3) Meaningless pre-coitus rituals are annoying.

Christ, I don't "feel like I can use them however I like." If I want to talk, I go find intelligent, smart girls, usually at the pub near the local college. If I want to have scantily dressed idiots cavorting around me I go to the club. The girls at the pub want to chat. The girls at the club want something more physical. The fact that they still feel they need to chat is ridiculous, a hangover from social decorum.

Again, it's not exploitation if both parties are consenting. What's so hard about this?
You're assuming they're offering it up. What you call cavorting like a whore, they may see as a solid social bonding venture. Assume they're just craving your dick and that they're only chatting to create some quasi form of connection which they don't even want anyways.


Far too naive. Come on, how often do you go to clubs?
How am I naive? I've been to clubs; I'm not a daily peruser. I know women who go to clubs. When they go, they don't go to get fucked; they go to have fun in a social setting with some cardio dancing on the side. The cardio bit is a little tongue-in-cheek. But you're the wise man of whores so I should just respect your authority on the subject, no?


I'm not talking about the entire female population of a club. :S
Denying that a sizeable handful of girls there want only to express their sexuality is naive. Assuming that they'd be interesting to talk to is even worse.
So they're just objects for sex?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.
I'm not saying they should be protected; they simply shouldn't be the victim of predation when they're looking for a legitimate bond. Women can do what they like with their sexuality; Emma Goldman ftw, but there has to be some form of legitimate audience with no coercive intentions which respects the control of their own sexuality. You're discard the chit chat which they obviously want to participate in since they are doing so is disrespectful.

I'm engaged, work full-time and go to school full-time; I have neither time nor desire to "beat the beats".


How is discarding the chit chat coercion? I don't want to talk; if they want to, I leave, I don't ball-gag them and drag them into the bathroom. Jesus.
If they didn't want to talk, they don't have to so assuming that you can just throw it out and get down to business is ignoring what they're obviously choosing to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
No. Sexuality for its own sake means they become objects?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Goat wrote:
Poor old Fridge, can't even go to a strip club without trapt getting all on his case with that feminist nonsense. What's the world coming to.


It's actually anti-feminist to take up that position. I mean, my librarian is an idiot. I interact with him to check out books, not to chat. Chatting makes the whole book-checking-out process a pain in the ass. See the analogy? He's there to give me books, not to chat. Miss Skirt-Higher-Than-Her-IQ on the dancefloor isn't there to chat either.
It's anti-feminist to claim that women aren't instruments who exist just to be fucked? They obviously can't think to your high caliber of standards so what other purpose would they have besides taking it between the supports?


It's anti-feminist to assume that women aren't able to determine for themselves the correct amount of worth to attribute to their sexuality. Or that they need to be protected from putting out in clubs.
I'm not saying they should be protected; they simply shouldn't be the victim of predation when they're looking for a legitimate bond. Women can do what they like with their sexuality; Emma Goldman ftw, but there has to be some form of legitimate audience with no coercive intentions which respects the control of their own sexuality. You're discard the chit chat which they obviously want to participate in since they are doing so is disrespectful.

I'm engaged, work full-time and go to school full-time; I have neither time nor desire to "beat the beats".


How is discarding the chit chat coercion? I don't want to talk; if they want to, I leave, I don't ball-gag them and drag them into the bathroom. Jesus.
If they didn't want to talk, they don't have to so assuming that you can just throw it out and get down to business is ignoring what they're obviously choosing to do.


What?? I wish they didn't want to talk. I wish they realized themselves that it's merely a societal standard imposed upon a freer expression of sexuality. They want to talk, I don't. I wish they were more like me. How the fuck is that coercion??

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group