Hit or Miss: The Beatles

noodles · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:15 pm

following the reaper wrote:

Led Zeppelin are terrible

yeah

Dago · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:29 pm

Yay, but I def don't love them.

Goat · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:32 pm

Anyone who thinks that Led Zep are terrible doesn't understand Rock music.

rio · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:44 pm

Grand Belial's Tea wrote:

Anyone who thinks that Led Zep are terrible doesn't understand Rock music.

Normally I hate sweeping statements like this, but.... +1

Cú Chulainn · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:44 pm

Even I think saying Led Zeppelin are terrible is moronic, and I like Nickelback! :ph34r:

noodles · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:28 pm

Grand Belial's Tea wrote:

Anyone who thinks that Led Zep are terrible doesn't understand Rock music.

you make rock sound so unappealing when you talk about it this way

Goat · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:31 pm

noodles wrote:

Grand Belial's Tea wrote:

Anyone who thinks that Led Zep are terrible doesn't understand Rock music.

you make rock sound so unappealing

Nice edit.

noodles · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:36 pm

i edited it liek 3x actually ^^

Thomas · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:48 pm

not my fav band.. But def a hit.

Goat · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:49 pm

noodles wrote:

i edited it liek 3x actually ^^

Being wrong clearly makes you nervous.

MetalStorm · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:37 pm

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

Led Zeppelin
The Doors
Cream
Jefferson Airplane
Black Sabbath

And a few others but those are the best that came out of that decade.

Legacy Of The Night · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:27 pm

I can listen to a few Led Zeppelin songs, but yeah, they're really boring. The Beatles are much better.

rio · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:31 pm

MetalStorm wrote:

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

The Doors
Cream

Not even close.....

:huh:

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:33 am

rio wrote:

Grand Belial's Tea wrote:

Anyone who thinks that Led Zep are terrible doesn't understand Rock music.

Normally I hate sweeping statements like this, but.... +1

x100

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:35 am

Rhys · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:10 am

MetalStorm wrote:

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

Led Zeppelin
The Doors
Cream
Jefferson Airplane
Black Sabbath

And a few others but those are the best that came out of that decade.

I thought Black Sabbath didn't release anything till the 70's :huh:

And seriously, I have no idea whats appealing about Led Zeppelin. I'm trying to listen to Led Zeppelin IV or whatever people call it and all im hearing is frankly annoying vocals and riifs that have that annoying blues feel.... like it when it feels like the riff is going in a circle, like jsut going nowhere.

Eternal Idol · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:05 am

following the reaper wrote:

MetalStorm wrote:

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

Led Zeppelin
The Doors
Cream
Jefferson Airplane
Black Sabbath

And a few others but those are the best that came out of that decade.

I thought Black Sabbath didn't release anything till the 70's :huh:

And seriously, I have no idea whats appealing about Led Zeppelin. I'm trying to listen to Led Zeppelin IV or whatever people call it and all im hearing is frankly annoying vocals and riifs that have that annoying blues feel.... like it when it feels like the riff is going in a circle, like jsut going nowhere.

Well, that's understandable. Led Zeppelin IV is more rooted in folk music than Rock music, and I'm not really big on that album either. The first 3 albums are revelations in Rock music, and are great from start to finish. I do feel Zeppelin did release some bad music though, particularly their later period stuff. Way too much John Paul Jones noodling around on a synthesizer, and not in a good way like Jon Lord, and not enough Jimmy Page. Presence and Coda are egresously bad.

noodles · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:46 am

i got to see two of my friends played an acoustic guitar/violin cover of stairway to heaven and it was pretty cool

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:05 am

Eternal Idol wrote:

following the reaper wrote:

MetalStorm wrote:

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

Led Zeppelin
The Doors
Cream
Jefferson Airplane
Black Sabbath

And a few others but those are the best that came out of that decade.

I thought Black Sabbath didn't release anything till the 70's :huh:

And seriously, I have no idea whats appealing about Led Zeppelin. I'm trying to listen to Led Zeppelin IV or whatever people call it and all im hearing is frankly annoying vocals and riifs that have that annoying blues feel.... like it when it feels like the riff is going in a circle, like jsut going nowhere.

Well, that's understandable. Led Zeppelin IV is more rooted in folk music than Rock music, and I'm not really big on that album either. The first 3 albums are revelations in Rock music, and are great from start to finish. I do feel Zeppelin did release some bad music though, particularly their later period stuff. Way too much John Paul Jones noodling around on a synthesizer, and not in a good way like Jon Lord, and not enough Jimmy Page. Presence and Coda are egresously bad.

The thing about Zeppelin is, no two albums sound the same; in fact no two Zep songs sound the same. They are nothing if not eclectic.
Zeppelin's best period for me is the years spanning '71-'77, or III - Presence.
Jimmy Page is one of the greatest songwriters ever (in rock), not to mention his fretmanship. To state otherwise is not only wrong, but also indicates some form of brain disorder; perhaps, for example: the brain sizzling tertiary stage of syphyllis, or not following the instructions provided by the warning labels on the back of paint solvent cannisters one too many times. Fetal alcohol syndrome also comes to mind.

Rhys · **Posted:** Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:13 am

cry of the banshee wrote:

Eternal Idol wrote:

following the reaper wrote:

MetalStorm wrote:

I can give you a list of bands that came out in the 60's that are better than the Beatles:

Led Zeppelin
The Doors
Cream
Jefferson Airplane
Black Sabbath

And a few others but those are the best that came out of that decade.

I thought Black Sabbath didn't release anything till the 70's :huh:

And seriously, I have no idea whats appealing about Led Zeppelin. I'm trying to listen to Led Zeppelin IV or whatever people call it and all im hearing is frankly annoying vocals and riifs that have that annoying blues feel.... like it when it feels like the riff is going in a circle, like jsut going nowhere.

Well, that's understandable. Led Zeppelin IV is more rooted in folk music than Rock music, and I'm not really big on that album either. The first 3 albums are revelations in Rock music, and are great from start to finish. I do feel Zeppelin did release some bad music though, particularly their later period stuff. Way too much John Paul Jones noodling around on a synthesizer, and not in a good way like Jon Lord, and not enough Jimmy Page. Presence and Coda are egresously bad.

The thing about Zeppelin is, no two albums sound the same; in fact no two Zep songs sound the same. They are nothing if not eclectic.
Zeppelin's best period for me is the years spanning '71-'77, or III - Presence.
Jimmy Page is one of the greatest songwriters ever (in rock), not to mention his fretmanship. To state otherwise is not only wrong, but also indicates some form of brain disorder; perhaps, for example: the brain sizzling tertiary stage of syphyllis, or not following the instructions provided by the warning labels on the back of paint solvent cannisters one too many times. Fetal alcohol syndrome also comes to mind.

Doctor, how long have I got? :omfg:

Metal Reviews

Hit or Miss: The Beatles

Who is online