Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 9:15 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:13 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
Rick Rubin is an absolute shit producer. I can't think of one thing he really improved that wouldn't have been better anyway. Not only that but Rick is a known thief and plagurist. "The Hunter" for example, was not written by Glenn Danzig / Rick Rubin, it was credited that way to make rick some money.

When a group agrees to hire rick rubin they are actually making the statement that they are so confident in their material that Rick Rubin can't ruin it.

The only album I can think of that Rick might have had a positive impact on was Danzig's first album, after that rick barely if at all showed up for the other Danzig albums he is credited for. Besides that, Glenn prodcued that album more than Rick.

Rick Rubin absolutely ruined Slipknot's 3rd (or 4th) album.

Rubin is one of those pompous assholes who has no background, knowledge or skill in musical production, but because the guy has money and co-owned a record company he thought he was competant enough to produce albums. This is not the case. While i'm on the subject if you are planning on recording anything of a serious nature (not a rough demo) hire a fucking engineer, they are better than you at sound. It's like trying to get johnny ramone to re-record Images and Words and do just as good as JP.

Anyway. I knew RR's influence on the album would only make it consistent. I was sure metallica would bring the goods, but why trust a man with a horrible track record? The good news for us is that rick is so hands off and Lars and Jams CAN produce and engineer a decent sounding album that rubin really couldn't do much to destroy it.

If you don't like the mastering, blame Warner Bros, because if you know what you're talking about they will demand nothing less than the loudest possible mastering. They will refuse to release the album until that concession is met. If you don't believe that, then name one album to be released by any record company that doesn't "replay gain" at below 4db. The only album I can think of is Lord's new album which is available in "full fidelity" (as a cd-r with no artwork) at their website.

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:09 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:24 am
Posts: 2826
Location: U.S.
Adveser wrote:
Rick Rubin is an absolute shit producer. I can't think of one thing he really improved that wouldn't have been better anyway. Not only that but Rick is a known thief and plagurist. "The Hunter" for example, was not written by Glenn Danzig / Rick Rubin, it was credited that way to make rick some money.

When a group agrees to hire rick rubin they are actually making the statement that they are so confident in their material that Rick Rubin can't ruin it.

The only album I can think of that Rick might have had a positive impact on was Danzig's first album, after that rick barely if at all showed up for the other Danzig albums he is credited for. Besides that, Glenn prodcued that album more than Rick.

Rick Rubin absolutely ruined Slipknot's 3rd (or 4th) album.

Rubin is one of those pompous assholes who has no background, knowledge or skill in musical production, but because the guy has money and co-owned a record company he thought he was competant enough to produce albums. This is not the case. While i'm on the subject if you are planning on recording anything of a serious nature (not a rough demo) hire a fucking engineer, they are better than you at sound. It's like trying to get johnny ramone to re-record Images and Words and do just as good as JP.

Anyway. I knew RR's influence on the album would only make it consistent. I was sure metallica would bring the goods, but why trust a man with a horrible track record? The good news for us is that rick is so hands off and Lars and Jams CAN produce and engineer a decent sounding album that rubin really couldn't do much to destroy it.

If you don't like the mastering, blame Warner Bros, because if you know what you're talking about they will demand nothing less than the loudest possible mastering. They will refuse to release the album until that concession is met. If you don't believe that, then name one album to be released by any record company that doesn't "replay gain" at below 4db. The only album I can think of is Lord's new album which is available in "full fidelity" (as a cd-r with no artwork) at their website.


I don't really think you can say that a producer is bad because you don't really know what he did/didn't do on the album. The influence isn't quantifiable...he might have had a lot of direction from the band as to how they want the record to sound. Plus, you said Rubin's so hands-off, so how can he really mess shit up that much?

That being said, maybe he does suck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:04 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
It is easy to know what a producer does.

A producer is the liason between the record company and the artist. The producer gives the record company the result they desire. Producers do not work for the band. As such, a lot of the time, the producer is selected by the record company.

In Rubin's case, He IS the record company on the majority of his work. He directs the production and if the band or artist goes another direction he will simply tell them to do it his way or they will be in breach of contract, either with American Def Jam or whatever company employs him.

Rubin may be hands off in that he stops by every week or so, but he firmly makes his position known and enforces his wishes upon the artist.

With this album his power is very diminished and he may have even had a friendly demeanor, but the past has shown rick makes bad decisions and insists he is right. Metallica record for E/M ventures which they are part owners, so he is working for Metallica and Elektra jointly. Unfortunatley in the eyes of those who are not interested in music for its own sake, he is a success. Thats bad news for those of us who want the best recording possible.

For instance, Rick is known for his refusal to record digitally or mix digitally. The man hates digitial. This is why his albums sound terrible. Analog is not as forgiving as digital for an amateur like Rick Rubin to record with. The man doesn't understand simple concepts such as oxidation of analog tape that wind up ruining is work.

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:51 am 
Offline
Metal Servant

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:23 am
Posts: 171
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:24 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Fatpom wrote:
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Troll.

Excellent resume such as?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:57 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:24 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Indiana
following the reaper wrote:
Fatpom wrote:
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Troll.

Excellent resume such as?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Rubin

If you scroll down a bit, there's a listing of albums he's produced. Not sure if I'd call it an excellent resume, but there are three classic Slayer albums in there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:16 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:01 am
Posts: 646
Maybe the problem was, that Rubin wasn't exactly the producer but more a mentor. In the mission metallica clips you could see Lars with a technician when they put the pieces together on the PC. Maybe there is the error source...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:58 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:44 pm
Posts: 6817
Location: Florida
Rick Rubin's awesome. He produced De-loused In The Comatorium and that's good enough for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:08 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Adam wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Fatpom wrote:
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Troll.

Excellent resume such as?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Rubin

If you scroll down a bit, there's a listing of albums he's produced. Not sure if I'd call it an excellent resume, but there are three classic Slayer albums in there.


Hmmmm, lots of those really loud albums in there....ie slipknot, red hot chili peppers, system of a down...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:48 am 
Offline
Metal Servant

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:23 am
Posts: 171
following the reaper wrote:
Fatpom wrote:
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Troll.

Excellent resume such as?

Lets just concentrate on the CLASSIC albums he's produced

Beastie Boys - Licence to Ill
Slayer - Reign In Blood/South Of Heaven/Seasons in the Abyss
Danzig - 1, 2 & 3.
Trouble - Trouble
RHCP - Blood, Sugar, Sex, Magic / Californication
System of A Down - Toxicity
The Mars Volta - De-Loused In the Comatorium

Those are just some of the nigh on legendary albums he's been involved in. Either brilliant or just massively successful. And doesn't include the dozens of other just 'really good' albums he's produced or the fact that he's credited with almost single handedly rejuvenating Johnny Cash's career.

I don't even care if you don't like all those bands (I don't) or albums or not. Ranting and raving as though he's the anti christ and ignoring the wealth of great material he has been associated with is reknobulous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:25 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 3581
Location: Cardiff, Wales
For what it's worth, I find the production on Deloused horrible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:31 am 
Offline
Metal King

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:16 am
Posts: 980
Location: Malta
The Slayer and Danzig albums have great production, though they don'y suffer from the same 'loudness' problem that Death Magnetic has.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:15 am 
Offline
Metal Servant
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:16 am
Posts: 177
SoulSociety wrote:
The Slayer and Danzig albums have great production, though they don'y suffer from the same 'loudness' problem that Death Magnetic has.

Those were the days!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:17 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
Yeah, but Rick had little to do with the sound of those albums directly. Its more that the process he insists on is flawed and even more so now that albums are at least 6 decibels too loud.

But yeah, it has really made me pursue older stuff knowing that the production will be phenominal compared to anything that comes out today.

But some recent stuff has sounded amazing. Anything Lord Tim Produces is amazing. Timo Tolkki is an amazing producer.

The problem is that the Ynwgie Malmsteens of the world that can not produce their own stuff do a horrible job.

Rick has never helped himself and gotten the techincal help he's needed. Luckily, Lars and James have more techincal knowledge of sound than Rick and what Metallica says, goes.

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:31 pm 
Offline
Metal King

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:16 am
Posts: 980
Location: Malta
Adveser wrote:
Yeah, but Rick had little to do with the sound of those albums directly. Its more that the process he insists on is flawed and even more so now that albums are at least 6 decibels too loud.

But yeah, it has really made me pursue older stuff knowing that the production will be phenominal compared to anything that comes out today.

But some recent stuff has sounded amazing. Anything Lord Tim Produces is amazing. Timo Tolkki is an amazing producer.

The problem is that the Ynwgie Malmsteens of the world that can not produce their own stuff do a horrible job.

Rick has never helped himself and gotten the techincal help he's needed. Luckily, Lars and James have more techincal knowledge of sound than Rick and what Metallica says, goes.


+1, though I don't consider myself a production expert the faults in DM do become obvious when you crank up the volume.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:16 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Fatpom wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Fatpom wrote:
Quit your blathering. He has an excellent resume.


Troll.

Excellent resume such as?

Lets just concentrate on the CLASSIC albums he's produced

Beastie Boys - Licence to Ill
Slayer - Reign In Blood/South Of Heaven/Seasons in the Abyss
Danzig - 1, 2 & 3.
Trouble - Trouble
RHCP - Blood, Sugar, Sex, Magic / Californication
System of A Down - Toxicity
The Mars Volta - De-Loused In the Comatorium

Those are just some of the nigh on legendary albums he's been involved in. Either brilliant or just massively successful. And doesn't include the dozens of other just 'really good' albums he's produced or the fact that he's credited with almost single handedly rejuvenating Johnny Cash's career.

I don't even care if you don't like all those bands (I don't) or albums or not. Ranting and raving as though he's the anti christ and ignoring the wealth of great material he has been associated with is reknobulous.


Those RHCP and SOAD albums (the only ones i've heard) have nothing special in their sound...... :rolleyes: They're just loud.....

They'd be "CLASSIC" even without Rubin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:56 am 
Offline
Metal Servant

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:23 am
Posts: 171
Right, so its just a massive coincidence that those bands had a major spike in quality when he was their producer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:17 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:16 am
Posts: 1596
Location: Top of the food chain in Calgary, Canada
I believe that Rick Rubin is responsible for this improved effort.

Producers can have a large influence on the band, they tell them what sounds good and what doesn't. They push them to new heights and better directions, and hopefully make the appropriate 'constructive' comments to get them there. They are the sounding board. In some cases (i.e. Mutt Lang), they actually do contribute to the creative process.

When you get a producer that tells the band everything sounds great when it's a piece of crap, you get things like St. Anger. When you get an involved producer who knows how to squeeze every last drop, you get things like Pyromania and South of Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:50 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Fatpom wrote:
Right, so its just a massive coincidence that those bands had a major spike in quality when he was their producer.


massive spike in quality? Toxicity was a massive step down in quality.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:33 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
following the reaper wrote:
Fatpom wrote:
Right, so its just a massive coincidence that those bands had a major spike in quality when he was their producer.


massive spike in quality? Toxicity was a massive step down in quality.


Well, commercial quality at least. The SOAD debut was kickass, but still relatively underground album. With Toxicity they started writing songs and got big, even if it took steps towards Nu Metal and wasn't as good as the s/t.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group