Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:44 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:55 am 
Offline
Metal Lord

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:55 pm
Posts: 624
Location: USA (Wincheter, TN.)
Its not. I just did not care for it that much. Was not "catchy" enuff for me. At the time, it drove modern rock away from the tv/radio and we lost alot of cool bands because of it, and to this day it has taken an eternity to even get melodic leads or sing-a-long chorus back into American Rock Culture.
I just have a grudge on that scene in general
Though i do admit to owning many of the albums (STP, Alice, some Nirvana/ Mad season, Soundgarden..etc)

It just drove away the better bands IMO.

yes Cornell has a good voice, but the first Audioslave was just not my cup of tea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:00 am 
Audioslave is mediocre through and through. Cornell has a killer voice, but Soundgarden was his band. His solo album sucks, so I have no faith in his next solo album.

Anyway, grunge replaced rock and that sucked, but there were some great grunge bands out there.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:42 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:10 am
Posts: 1763
Location: USA and Asia
EpicMetalFan30 wrote:
Its not. I just did not care for it that much. Was not "catchy" enuff for me. At the time, it drove modern rock away from the tv/radio and we lost alot of cool bands because of it, and to this day it has taken an eternity to even get melodic leads or sing-a-long chorus back into American Rock Culture.
I just have a grudge on that scene in general
Though i do admit to owning many of the albums (STP, Alice, some Nirvana/ Mad season, Soundgarden..etc)

It just drove away the better bands IMO.

yes Cornell has a good voice, but the first Audioslave was just not my cup of tea.


For radio shit it is ok (Audioslave), you know I will take Nirvana or Soundgarden anyday over Trixster, Kix and Winger......... That is just me though, at least grunge had some soul to it or something and just didn't feel like a plastic fashion show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 4:16 pm 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:22 am
Posts: 268
Location: Cyprus
Though I absolutely hate grunge, it wasn't what killed metal. Metal commercially killed itself because it got too complex for the average fan to grasp. In the late 80's/ early 90's you had all these great bands releasing monumental albums, that were just too technical and powerful to sell to the mass. Gargoyle "Nothing is Sacred", Sanctuary "Refuge denied", Wicked Maraya, and the list goes on and on. So the labels turned to grunge which was the complete opposite. Simplistic, mellowed out and with whining replacing metal's rage and energy. So that started selling, and when the big bands like metallica started borrowing elements from that sound, metal went to the underground. Of course painkiller came out in 91 and send them all straight to hell but that's another story alltogether :)

Leee is right about the plastic fashion show, at the end of its peak poser metal adopted the pop mentality and produced songs catered to sell, hence lost the "street feel" of bands like Skid Row and such. Grunge did have soul at it's origin, but it wasn't long before it turned into a dope show, the washed up icons of which you can see even today (courtney anyone?). All in all I find it to be a plague in the music industry, not because it hurt the sales for heavy metal, but because it basically killed technical and powerful music in the market.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:06 pm 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 342
Asgardlord wrote:
Though I absolutely hate grunge, it wasn't what killed metal. Metal commercially killed itself because it got too complex for the average fan to grasp. In the late 80's/ early 90's you had all these great bands releasing monumental albums, that were just too technical and powerful to sell to the mass. Gargoyle "Nothing is Sacred", Sanctuary "Refuge denied", Wicked Maraya, and the list goes on and on. So the labels turned to grunge which was the complete opposite. Simplistic, mellowed out and with whining replacing metal's rage and energy. So that started selling, and when the big bands like metallica started borrowing elements from that sound, metal went to the underground. Of course painkiller came out in 91 and send them all straight to hell but that's another story alltogether :)


And that's all...But we can't say about "death of metal" in the 90s. For instance because of Black Metal, which was far from being complex (so it has perfectly adjusted itself to the fashion of the 90s), but it was still METAL and it was popular then :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group