Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:00 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3   
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: True Worthy Black Metal
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:30 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Posts: 558
Location: In The Shadow Of The Horns
Lord Jotun wrote:
valefor wrote:
Lord Jotun wrote:
Nebulosus wrote:

The List of False Black Metal- to warn others.

1- Cradle of Filth (Posers polluting Black Metal.)
2- Dimmu Borgir (Dimmu Borgir is pop camouflaged as BM.)
3- Marduk (Swedish metal for retarded people unable to understand TRUE music.)
4- Dark Funeral (Fuck Off!)
5- Dark Divinity (Teens in saggy pants trying to be true.)
6- Carpe Noctem (Teens in saggy pants trying to be true.)
7- New Satyricon (Trying to "teach Black Metal" to Americans!)
8- Luxuria de Lilith (It is even Brazilian! Fuck Off!)
9- Graveland (Poser Synth Black Metal trying to be True. They are attemting to change the Black Metal Ideology.)
10- Carpathian Forest (They are not taking Black Metal seriously, and they are even joking about it!)


OMG DOOD YUO TEH UBERFUKKINNEKROKVTL!!!!111

...and who the fuck are Dark Divinty and Luxuria de Lilith anyway?


You disagree with the assessment of those bands?
aside from the funny descriptions
(and the inclusion of Graveland, though I feel they are way overrated), he is right... I would also add 1349 to that list and remove Immortal from the worthy list.
How can he cite Immortal and neglect Xasthur, Vargsang, Black Blood and many others that are keeping the old ways alive?
V.


I didn't take that seriously, but I'm getting sick of the constant bashing. Woohoo, someone discovered that Cradle Of Filth and Dimmu Borgir are not true BM, how impressive!!!
Yeah, Graveland are a tad overrated (I just find they haven't been progressing at all with their newer stuff, though The Fire of Awakening is a brilliant album IMO), but defining them "poser synth BM" is ridiculous - following this train of thought, we'd have Summoning being the next to be cast into the trashcan, and other interesting acts such as Nokturnal Mortum as well, probably.

But again, I didn't take it all too seriously; also, you have correctly pointed out the astonishing absence of some pretty essential names, therefore I can safely say I'm done with this.[/i]


Well, the obligatory Cradle/Dimmu bashing kinda goes with the territory, and it is not wholly without foundation, since a lot of people actually consider them to be Black metal.
That being said, just because a band isn't "true" doesn't mean they suck: Limbonic Art (Moon In The Scorpio(), is only one example of good not-so-true Black metal.
V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: True Worthy Black Metal
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:56 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Posts: 558
Location: In The Shadow Of The Horns
Gast1 wrote:
valefor wrote:
Lord Jotun wrote:
Nebulosus wrote:

The List of False Black Metal- to warn others.

1- Cradle of Filth (Posers polluting Black Metal.)
2- Dimmu Borgir (Dimmu Borgir is pop camouflaged as BM.)
3- Marduk (Swedish metal for retarded people unable to understand TRUE music.)
4- Dark Funeral (Fuck Off!)
5- Dark Divinity (Teens in saggy pants trying to be true.)
6- Carpe Noctem (Teens in saggy pants trying to be true.)
7- New Satyricon (Trying to "teach Black Metal" to Americans!)
8- Luxuria de Lilith (It is even Brazilian! Fuck Off!)
9- Graveland (Poser Synth Black Metal trying to be True. They are attemting to change the Black Metal Ideology.)
10- Carpathian Forest (They are not taking Black Metal seriously, and they are even joking about it!)


OMG DOOD YUO TEH UBERFUKKINNEKROKVTL!!!!111

...and who the fuck are Dark Divinty and Luxuria de Lilith anyway?


You disagree with the assessment of those bands?
aside from the funny descriptions
(and the inclusion of Graveland, though I feel they are way overrated), he is right... I would also add 1349 to that list and remove Immortal from the worthy list.
How can he cite Immortal and neglect Xasthur, Vargsang, Black Blood and many others that are keeping the old ways alive?
V.

yeah, fuck off immortal and there is far better stuff than graveland around. but that's just a matter of taste, i'm sure he hasn't heard all of it, so it's logical he can't include all. the same goes for us.


I don't see how anybody could possibly find the time to hear all of the bands out there, there are just too many.
He did list some worthy bands though.
I really like Tenebrae in Perpetuum... number 1? I don't know, but it is quite good.
V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: True Worthy Black Metal
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:50 am 
Offline
Banned Mallcore Kiddie

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:30 am
Posts: 237
Gast1 wrote:
yeah, fuck off immortal and there is far better stuff than graveland around. but that's just a matter of taste, i'm sure he hasn't heard all of it, so it's logical he can't include all. the same goes for us.


Yeah, why do I care what this idiot says about Graveland? He obviously hasn't heard everything. Really, I don't care, but sometimes people just say goddammed retarded shit, and what he said is, not just that he didn't like Graveland, but that along with not liking them, Rob Darken and everything associated with the bands discog is poser-ific, culminating in synth garbage. THAT'S a good reason to vent. And, aside from you, Gast, I bet every BM head here would put something shitty like a DSO album before Thousand Swords, so why should I even try and defend a good band when they've already condemmed it to make room for acts I would rather see disbanded. Hell, maybe even YOU would put DSO before Graveland, but it'd be rather surprising to me. Matter of opinion, in all cases, but yeah... no one's heard everything, and I'll ALWAYS fight for Graveland's validity amongst the greats. So I did, and now I'm done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: True Worthy Black Metal
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:06 am 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Posts: 558
Location: In The Shadow Of The Horns
OurFinestCoward wrote:
Gast1 wrote:
yeah, fuck off immortal and there is far better stuff than graveland around. but that's just a matter of taste, i'm sure he hasn't heard all of it, so it's logical he can't include all. the same goes for us.


Yeah, why do I care what this idiot says about Graveland? He obviously hasn't heard everything. Really, I don't care, but sometimes people just say goddammed retarded shit, and what he said is, not just that he didn't like Graveland, but that along with not liking them, Rob Darken and everything associated with the bands discog is poser-ific, culminating in synth garbage. THAT'S a good reason to vent. And, aside from you, Gast, I bet every BM head here would put something shitty like a DSO album before Thousand Swords, so why should I even try and defend a good band when they've already condemmed it to make room for acts I would rather see disbanded. Hell, maybe even YOU would put DSO before Graveland, but it'd be rather surprising to me. Matter of opinion, in all cases, but yeah... no one's heard everything, and I'll ALWAYS fight for Graveland's validity amongst the greats. So I did, and now I'm done.


Haha... not me my freind. Deathspell Omega are more overrated than Graveland. Graveland is good and hardly a poseur band, but people deem his work as masterpeices of Black metal, and to me, at least, that is a little much.
V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:27 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:19 am
Posts: 960
valefor wrote:
Radical Cut wrote:
OurFinestCoward wrote:
...

If good music is good music, why bother looking at the spectacle half (The tr00ness) at all? Don't enjoy it? Turn the volume up and close your eyes.

...+1

No shit. It's not like I'm going to refuse to listen to any underground Black Metal that is respected by the tr00er black metal fans, but that doesn't change how I feel about people who are obsessed only with how kvlt their internet black metal list is.

If your reason for a band being bad is that they aren't true black metal, you're a fucking retard. That's all.


The reason why bands like Dimmy and CoF are bad is because they suck, they reek of pomposity and pretentiousness, it just so happens that they are not true Black metal.
And it just do happens that the so-called True, raw black metal is superior in every aspect and is called true because it lives up to strict aesthetical criteria. Take the list for example: the first slot went to Tenebrae in Perpetuum, and they are a perfect exmple of the "true" aeshetic.
The main problem with the underground is the saturation of bands that think just because you don corpsepaint and play raw minimalist music, it is automatically aesthetically true Black metal... this is of course false. That makes it more difficult to seperate the wheat from the chaff, but it is well worth it to find the few exalted examples of what the art of Black metal is SUPPOSED to be..
CoF and Dimmy (and many others), call (or used to) themselves Black metal,
and they just aren't, thereby earning the scorn from those that know the underground... the equivalent of poseuerdom, if you will. Black metal is necro, grim, minimalist and raw. And hearing bands like Dimmy and CoF and their ilk referred to as Black metal is the same as a typical metalhead hearing somebody claim that Guns and Roses is Thrash. Maybe not the best example, but you get my point.
Should anybody refuse to listen to them because of their "falseness"? That is a personal decision, of course, but if they are given the proverbial spin and deemed as a waste of time,
that is just the way it goes... I have given all of CoF's and Dimmy's albums a chance and they all failed... miserably. I like a few of their respective tracks (Queen of Winter, Throned) but that is all.
It is well known that the Black Metal underground is oftentimes accused of elitism, and rightly so; we want our art to be preserved undefiled, if that doesn't sit well with some, thats too fucking bad, I personally couldn't care less.
I do agree that good music is good music, though, and listen to other styles, notably true Batcave/Deathrock (Dead Roses Garden, Cinema Strange), a smattering of Punk (Discharge, Dr.Know), Horrorpunk (The Crimson Ghosts, Calabrese, and of course the Misfits/Samhain) and Psychobilly (Asmodeus, Damage Done By Worms, Godless Wicked Creeps) and even a little '80's pop haha!
V.

That's all well and good, and I know how you feel to an extent.

But for me, "strict aesthetical criteria" and the like simply don't belong in music. I don't want to see music genres "preserved undefiled" for all of time. Defiling music excites me a great deal in fact :lol: . Many of my favorite bands just so happen to be bands that have come from the black metal scene to do something far different, and for me far greater, than 'true black metal'. A Blaze in the Northern Sky is absolutely phenominal, but that was 14 years ago. I don't see the need for a band like Sin Origin, who are simply attempting to recapture that earlier sound and failing to produce any of the magic (for lack of a grimmer term). There is of course still great music coming from the depths of utter grimness, but I obviously don't feel the same ties to certain aspects of the scene as you and others do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:59 am 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:23 pm
Posts: 558
Location: In The Shadow Of The Horns
Radical Cut wrote:
valefor wrote:
Radical Cut wrote:
OurFinestCoward wrote:
...

If good music is good music, why bother looking at the spectacle half (The tr00ness) at all? Don't enjoy it? Turn the volume up and close your eyes.

...+1

No shit. It's not like I'm going to refuse to listen to any underground Black Metal that is respected by the tr00er black metal fans, but that doesn't change how I feel about people who are obsessed only with how kvlt their internet black metal list is.

If your reason for a band being bad is that they aren't true black metal, you're a fucking retard. That's all.


The reason why bands like Dimmy and CoF are bad is because they suck, they reek of pomposity and pretentiousness, it just so happens that they are not true Black metal.
And it just do happens that the so-called True, raw black metal is superior in every aspect and is called true because it lives up to strict aesthetical criteria. Take the list for example: the first slot went to Tenebrae in Perpetuum, and they are a perfect exmple of the "true" aeshetic.
The main problem with the underground is the saturation of bands that think just because you don corpsepaint and play raw minimalist music, it is automatically aesthetically true Black metal... this is of course false. That makes it more difficult to seperate the wheat from the chaff, but it is well worth it to find the few exalted examples of what the art of Black metal is SUPPOSED to be..
CoF and Dimmy (and many others), call (or used to) themselves Black metal,
and they just aren't, thereby earning the scorn from those that know the underground... the equivalent of poseuerdom, if you will. Black metal is necro, grim, minimalist and raw. And hearing bands like Dimmy and CoF and their ilk referred to as Black metal is the same as a typical metalhead hearing somebody claim that Guns and Roses is Thrash. Maybe not the best example, but you get my point.
Should anybody refuse to listen to them because of their "falseness"? That is a personal decision, of course, but if they are given the proverbial spin and deemed as a waste of time,
that is just the way it goes... I have given all of CoF's and Dimmy's albums a chance and they all failed... miserably. I like a few of their respective tracks (Queen of Winter, Throned) but that is all.
It is well known that the Black Metal underground is oftentimes accused of elitism, and rightly so; we want our art to be preserved undefiled, if that doesn't sit well with some, thats too fucking bad, I personally couldn't care less.
I do agree that good music is good music, though, and listen to other styles, notably true Batcave/Deathrock (Dead Roses Garden, Cinema Strange), a smattering of Punk (Discharge, Dr.Know), Horrorpunk (The Crimson Ghosts, Calabrese, and of course the Misfits/Samhain) and Psychobilly (Asmodeus, Damage Done By Worms, Godless Wicked Creeps) and even a little '80's pop haha!
V.

That's all well and good, and I know how you feel to an extent.

But for me, "strict aesthetical criteria" and the like simply don't belong in music. I don't want to see music genres "preserved undefiled" for all of time. Defiling music excites me a great deal in fact :lol: . Many of my favorite bands just so happen to be bands that have come from the black metal scene to do something far different, and for me far greater, than 'true black metal'. A Blaze in the Northern Sky is absolutely phenominal, but that was 14 years ago. I don't see the need for a band like Sin Origin, who are simply attempting to recapture that earlier sound and failing to produce any of the magic (for lack of a grimmer term). There is of course still great music coming from the depths of utter grimness, but I obviously don't feel the same ties to certain aspects of the scene as you and others do.


Yeah, I agree with that. There is a place for everything... take Arcturus. They came from the black metal scene but evolved into something different, and they have put out some excellent music.
Other examples would be Emperor and Ulver.
But as you probably know, when it comes to black metal, I am a purist. Again that is not to say that other styles of music suck or should even remain static, but just like some people like their steak bloody rare, I like my Black metal raw and, yes, true.
And it is a sad fact that too many bands attempt to create the grimness of the masters, only to fail... like all things, only the few can occupy the top.
V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: True Worthy Black Metal
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:45 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
valefor wrote:
OurFinestCoward wrote:
Gast1 wrote:
yeah, fuck off immortal and there is far better stuff than graveland around. but that's just a matter of taste, i'm sure he hasn't heard all of it, so it's logical he can't include all. the same goes for us.


Yeah, why do I care what this idiot says about Graveland? He obviously hasn't heard everything. Really, I don't care, but sometimes people just say goddammed retarded shit, and what he said is, not just that he didn't like Graveland, but that along with not liking them, Rob Darken and everything associated with the bands discog is poser-ific, culminating in synth garbage. THAT'S a good reason to vent. And, aside from you, Gast, I bet every BM head here would put something shitty like a DSO album before Thousand Swords, so why should I even try and defend a good band when they've already condemmed it to make room for acts I would rather see disbanded. Hell, maybe even YOU would put DSO before Graveland, but it'd be rather surprising to me. Matter of opinion, in all cases, but yeah... no one's heard everything, and I'll ALWAYS fight for Graveland's validity amongst the greats. So I did, and now I'm done.


Haha... not me my freind. Deathspell Omega are more overrated than Graveland. Graveland is good and hardly a poseur band, but people deem his work as masterpeices of Black metal, and to me, at least, that is a little much.
V.

I tried DSO, I tried them more than I wanted to because of Daniel's view on them, but Deathspell Omega just sucks beyond measurable entities.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:51 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Radical Cut wrote:
valefor wrote:
Radical Cut wrote:
OurFinestCoward wrote:
...

If good music is good music, why bother looking at the spectacle half (The tr00ness) at all? Don't enjoy it? Turn the volume up and close your eyes.

...+1

No shit. It's not like I'm going to refuse to listen to any underground Black Metal that is respected by the tr00er black metal fans, but that doesn't change how I feel about people who are obsessed only with how kvlt their internet black metal list is.

If your reason for a band being bad is that they aren't true black metal, you're a fucking retard. That's all.


The reason why bands like Dimmy and CoF are bad is because they suck, they reek of pomposity and pretentiousness, it just so happens that they are not true Black metal.
And it just do happens that the so-called True, raw black metal is superior in every aspect and is called true because it lives up to strict aesthetical criteria. Take the list for example: the first slot went to Tenebrae in Perpetuum, and they are a perfect exmple of the "true" aeshetic.
The main problem with the underground is the saturation of bands that think just because you don corpsepaint and play raw minimalist music, it is automatically aesthetically true Black metal... this is of course false. That makes it more difficult to seperate the wheat from the chaff, but it is well worth it to find the few exalted examples of what the art of Black metal is SUPPOSED to be..
CoF and Dimmy (and many others), call (or used to) themselves Black metal,
and they just aren't, thereby earning the scorn from those that know the underground... the equivalent of poseuerdom, if you will. Black metal is necro, grim, minimalist and raw. And hearing bands like Dimmy and CoF and their ilk referred to as Black metal is the same as a typical metalhead hearing somebody claim that Guns and Roses is Thrash. Maybe not the best example, but you get my point.
Should anybody refuse to listen to them because of their "falseness"? That is a personal decision, of course, but if they are given the proverbial spin and deemed as a waste of time,
that is just the way it goes... I have given all of CoF's and Dimmy's albums a chance and they all failed... miserably. I like a few of their respective tracks (Queen of Winter, Throned) but that is all.
It is well known that the Black Metal underground is oftentimes accused of elitism, and rightly so; we want our art to be preserved undefiled, if that doesn't sit well with some, thats too fucking bad, I personally couldn't care less.
I do agree that good music is good music, though, and listen to other styles, notably true Batcave/Deathrock (Dead Roses Garden, Cinema Strange), a smattering of Punk (Discharge, Dr.Know), Horrorpunk (The Crimson Ghosts, Calabrese, and of course the Misfits/Samhain) and Psychobilly (Asmodeus, Damage Done By Worms, Godless Wicked Creeps) and even a little '80's pop haha!
V.

That's all well and good, and I know how you feel to an extent.

But for me, "strict aesthetical criteria" and the like simply don't belong in music. I don't want to see music genres "preserved undefiled" for all of time. Defiling music excites me a great deal in fact :lol: . Many of my favorite bands just so happen to be bands that have come from the black metal scene to do something far different, and for me far greater, than 'true black metal'. A Blaze in the Northern Sky is absolutely phenominal, but that was 14 years ago. I don't see the need for a band like Sin Origin, who are simply attempting to recapture that earlier sound and failing to produce any of the magic (for lack of a grimmer term). There is of course still great music coming from the depths of utter grimness, but I obviously don't feel the same ties to certain aspects of the scene as you and others do.

In the true black metal scene there is indeed too big a shitload of crap. But there are also bands really worthy and refreshing. Mystic Forest, Forest Of Fog, Lunar Aurora, Paysage D'Hiver, Vinterriket, Darkspace, Interritus, Drudkh, Irrwisch, Aichmophoba, are all bands that sounds extremely original, but without forgetting their roots.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group