Ness wrote:
Adveser wrote:
Found out something about my voice which explains an awful lot. My singing sounds like shit under one condition that I know how to avoid from now on. I don't wanna say too much, but my voice is capable of doing something no one else can do. My false folds overlap my real folds and there is horizontal space where the false folds are wider than the real ones for the overlap and controlling this along with the air gap between the two sets vertically means I can bias the harmonics to my voice and add frequencies that do weird shit to the signal that is generated in this additional space.
I also have to be more aware of resetting my larynx. I had to do this again last night and it has probably been a long while since it needed it. There are tendons that wrap around the parts of the larynx and long story short there are ways to change the shape of the cartilage and other things that if things get out of balance and really it's fucked up will make you sound awful. This is something I do not think most singers even know and no one does anything about it. The old myth about singing for such a time as to damage the voice is related as well as singer's getting fatigued by putting air in a part of the voice that has literally moved from where it was and they are stressing out a part that is not used to the violence and relying on the secondary vibration to work where they are used to.
I'm still working out the schematic and trying to put into words how to bias the vocal with back EMF, negative resistance and how to use hysteresis and the avalanche condition to good effect. If singer's would study Diodes, specifically Thyristors they would understand so much more about how it functions.
Nope, you're just tone deaf.
You obviously have no clue what the term means, nor do you understand the point I have made 1000 times, which is that I do things in the most difficult manner possible including doing things that are actually the opposite of their function for the sake of being able to control every muscle both naturally and inversely. I have my own system that has given more more ability than anyone will likely ever see again. The fact that a bunch of crappy demos sound exactly like the amount of effort, care and thought that were put into them which was little, does not reflect how I choose to sound when I am in a situation where it up to me how to sound, which because I choose to practice in this manner means it can be anything. I have the freedom to do whatever I want and if someone takes those demos as other than "look at how close I can get my voice to ______" then I'm sorry, but they are mistaken. I've had reactions to the most recent demos that have surprised me because of how enthusiastic they have been when they are just me demonstrating tonal diversity and my complete insistence that they likely sound like a trainwreck if reverse engineered to eliminate the original recordings.