Zad wrote:
Credibility? CREDIBILITY?! Bloody hell, Pete, have I not reviewed enough underground Metal for your liking? Is there some corner of the scene that lacks my attention in some shape, manner or form? Or is this just bitter eggs because your favourite Thrash album hasn't been reviewed, in which case you have no room to attack me for wanting to review something non-Thrash?
Metal Reviews is a fucking BASTION of the underground. It's all very well moaning about a review that HASN'T EVEN HAPPENED YET, but where were you when the underground was getting mentioned, where were your comments supporting my reviews of Thrash bands that, say, come from Yugoslavia and as such might well be considered part of the underground Thrash movement, if such a thing exists? Metal Reviews could review nothing but Limp Bizkit for the next month, giving it favourable scores and calling it 'the future of Metal as we know it', and still the site overall would have more credibility than you could build up in a lifetime.
Try reading what I say: I fully intend to continue to support the underground Metal scene. One. Review. Of. Something. Different. A. Week. Will. Not. Hurt. Anyone. Jesus, I don't remember this level of unrest when Misha was reviewing albums of minimalist piano, and only a blind, deaf chav retard with no ears, brains or eyebrows would consider Pearl Jam to be less Metal than minimalist piano. Is there an extra chromosome in your DNA, perhaps? Is that why you're entering such nonsense?
"Allright mate, been on metalreviews.com yet?"
"No I haven't yet, should I?"
"Yeah, it's a fucking BASTION for the underground!"
"OK then, I guess I should check it out!"
*a day passes*
"Metal Reviews is fucking awesome!"
"Oh cool, you went on it then? Find out about any good underground shit?"
"Yeah man, I've been listening to fucking PEARL JAM all night!"