Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:42 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   

Board index » MetalReviews » News
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Anonymous
 Post subject: 'DIMMU BORGIR Artwork Banned; iTunes Single Available Tuesda
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:13 pm 
You're welcome to comment on:
Quote:
Release Dates - DIMMU BORGIR Artwork Banned; iTunes Single Available Tuesday

Published on Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:11 am
Source: Blabbermouth


Click here to read the article.
Top
  
 
Ness
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:17 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 8992
Location: Husker Nation
Are you frikin kidding me?
Top
 Profile  
 
Dylan@Metalreviews
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:56 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:05 pm
Posts: 959
Location: USA (Nashville,TN)
That's what you get for putting satanic 'teets on the front cover. :rolleyes:
Top
 Profile  
 
DeathScream\m/
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:10 am 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:31 am
Posts: 241
Location: Blashyrkh (Mighty Ravendark)
Well this should help the album sell even more...
Top
 Profile  
 
hellraiser_xes
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:51 am 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:30 am
Posts: 2118
Location: Seremban, Malaysia
This is one of the weirdest bullshit I've heard in my life. The cover is horrible, is that why they're banning it?

I've heard the whole album, and it was trooly horrible. Far worse than 'DCA'. I frankly couldn't get pass through the 3rd song and I forced myself to listen to the 4th track. I give up. I've had it for the pass 2 weeks and I've not listened to the whole album. I just can't bring myself to listen to shit like that.

It's official:
TURD OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to DIMMU BORGIR.

By the way, Marduk totally pawns for this years' black metal scene. Great album.
Top
 Profile  
 
Anonymous
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:53 am 
hellraiser_xes wrote:
By the way, Marduk totally pawns for this years' black metal scene. Great album.


If it is true that Marduk will release the best bm record of 2007, it will be a bleak year indeed.
Top
  
 
Dylan@Metalreviews
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:46 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:05 pm
Posts: 959
Location: USA (Nashville,TN)
hellraiser_xes wrote:
This is one of the weirdest bullshit I've heard in my life. The cover is horrible, is that why they're banning it?

I've heard the whole album, and it was trooly horrible. Far worse than 'DCA'. I frankly couldn't get pass through the 3rd song and I forced myself to listen to the 4th track. I give up. I've had it for the pass 2 weeks and I've not listened to the whole album. I just can't bring myself to listen to shit like that.

It's official:
TURD OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to DIMMU BORGIR.

By the way, Marduk totally pawns for this years' black metal scene. Great album.
I think that the new Dimmu is pretty good. Not as "black" as the new Marduk, but pretty damn epic and catchy.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rhys
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:49 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
What? That cover was not even marginally offensive.
Top
 Profile  
 
Cú Chulainn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:04 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.

Top
 Profile  
 
Rhys
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:08 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.
Top
 Profile  
 
Cú Chulainn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:14 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.

Top
 Profile  
 
Rhys
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:18 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P
Top
 Profile  
 
Cú Chulainn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:21 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P


Why shouldn't they be? I'm fine with it.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.

Top
 Profile  
 
Rhys
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:25 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P


Why shouldn't they be? I'm fine with it.


But is your mom, or your local priest?
Top
 Profile  
 
Cú Chulainn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:32 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P


Why shouldn't they be? I'm fine with it.


But is your mom, or your local priest?


Is my mom or my local priest going to buy the new Dimmu Burger cd?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.

Top
 Profile  
 
Dylan@Metalreviews
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:36 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:05 pm
Posts: 959
Location: USA (Nashville,TN)
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P


Why shouldn't they be? I'm fine with it.


But is your mom, or your local priest?


Is my mom or my local priest going to buy the new Dimmu Burger cd?
No, but they are going to have to deal with the unholy actions and ideas you spew forth after you buy the CD.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rhys
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:37 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Banning it just for the sake of banning something? What about freedom of speech?


With every freedom comes a responsibility. here there is a responsibility to balance freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from images a lot of them would find offensive.


As long as it represents something morally correct, there shouldn't be any outcries.


Are goat-titties morally correct? :P


Why shouldn't they be? I'm fine with it.


But is your mom, or your local priest?


Is my mom or my local priest going to buy the new Dimmu Burger cd?


They may see it in a record store. Or your mother may not approve of you seeing those goat tits. Democractic society has to weigh up that kind of stuff. Not really easy. (although a lot of it is entagled in beauracracy)
Top
 Profile  
 
Caligula_K
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:09 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 3561
Smell the glooooooooove... they should just make a completely black cover.
Top
 Profile  
 
Astaroth
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:10 pm 
i can understand why it got banned.. those tits are she-male tits :wacko: ... full of silicon, out of shape and points in different direction... shame on you, DB, for being perverted
Top
  
 
Marasmus
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:18 pm 
Offline
Svartalfar

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:03 pm
Posts: 17
April fool's joke, I guess.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   

Board index » MetalReviews » News


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group