I have no problem accepting it when someone thinks something sucks. I might agree or disagree, either with their opinion, or the reasons they give for it, but that really doesn't matter. You might say that Led Zeppelin sucks (for example), and I might agree or disagree. I might ask you why you think that, but I probably wouldn't. Most of the time when someone says something like that I just dismiss it and go on. Maybe they have actually thought about it before deciding/saying it and maybe they didn't But most of the time it's not really worth mentioning because they don't get it anyway, no matter how much reasoning you give them. In fact, I probably wouldn't have mentioned it now if it wasn't something I was thinking about and discussing with some other people during the last few days.
But to get offended or annoyed when someone actually does ask why you think that is pretty extreme. Yeah, some people just do that to be annoying, but others (such as myself) are genuinely interested. When there's a genuine interest, I think it's a compliment that they want to know something about how you think, and it shows a level of respect that saying simply "it sucks" doesn't.
Why a person
likes or
dislikes something is irrelevant. If a person can or wants to put into words why they like or dislike something, fine, but if not it that's okay too. When we like or dislike things we are not assigning a quality to them we are simply recognizing our personal taste. When we say a band sucks, it actually says
nothing about whether or not we like them.
Quote:
Edit - whats all that shit about homework? lol, wtf? Yeah coz that would happen, for a start he's getting moeny for it. I mean if someone was gonna pay me to explain then christ i'd write them a fucking book on it
OKay, maybe it wasn't the best example, but it's a situation that's not as far fetched as you might first think, sadly. Yes, when that kind of thing happens it's usually more subtle, but ultimately the prof gets paid whether you're satisfied with his teaching or not. ... The point is, no self-respecting student would be amused, let alone satisfied with that scenario.
Quote:
If someone really wanted to know why you have formed an opinon on something then you would have to explain every single event in your life up until the point that you formed the opinion
By the way, that reeks of being a slippery slope / fallacious argument... and if someone starts in on you to explain your reason for your reasons and then your reasons for your reasons for the reason... then they're clearly, as you put it, "tossers"
-Tyrion