Carnifex Umbris wrote:
Misha wrote:
metalNESS wrote:
Misha wrote:
Indeed, really nice interview! If I have to give some sort of criticism, be it that some of the questions are a bit the same, and hence the answers too. It's not really annoying though.
Amon Amarth dude wrote:
metal in general is actually obviously the musical style that is closest related to classical music
*laughs at Amon Amarth dude*
I'm telling you dude. Jazz is not even close.
I'm not talking jazz. What do you all consider classical music by the way?
The usual. Beethoven, Brahms, Bach, Wagner, Orff (you can't tell me those last two aren't the great-great-great-times-whatever granddaddies of metal, at least in the spirit it embraces), Mahler, Mozart, Grieg (Savatage anyone?), Rachmaninoff, Mussorgsky (how much more parallel do I have to get here?)...that sort of thing.
Ok, that's the usual, now there are several genres that get a lot closer to classical music. First, there is music that you will likely not consider classical music, I do, but it sounds very different from what you understand from the term: dodecaphony, serialism, tonal music ,phenomenons like Cage and ragtime alike music (Nancarrow). Then there is music that is hard to recon as classical music, as it doesn't use 12 notes to an octave: microtonal music. That often includes totalism. Totalism sprang from minimalism, the same goes for post-minimalism. Minimalism as a subgenre of classical music is widely denied by critics, composers and teachers. The genres of totalism and post-minimalism therefore too. I'm not even talking about spectralism, Indian "folk" and some obvious composers in the filmscore genre, Yann Tiersen, Morricone for example. I also agree with Noodles point on progressive rock.