Quote:
imo, having found 100 kg explosives and considering he founded a neo-nazi organisation should be sufficient to keep him locked. that plus the fact he only did 12 of the 21 years sentence he has be condemned to...
Umm, no. Unless of course, you're in favor of jailing people for thought crimes. :roll:
The explosives were found before his trial for killing Euronymous. Now, that trial is long over with, and as I recall, the whole explosives thing came up during then anyway. Point is, that's done and over with. He was convicted, he was sentenced, and he's serving his sentence.
But wait!! Suddenly, 9 years in, the government changed its mind and by making the new law retroactive, effectively changed his sentence as well. He's apparently not being given any kind of option to appeal or anything. Now what the fuck is that about? They want him to honor a code that society sets forth, yet they don't want to honor it themselves? How is he supposed to react to this? How would you react?
Do you think that if they made a law that reduced the time (instead of increasing it) to ten years, they'd have made it retroactive? And if they did, how would they handle situations with prisoners who had already put in more time than the new law would require?
Don't be supportive of them for keeping him in prison, and then say, "well, he only did 12 of the 21 years so..." when that falls under the terms of the sentence in the first place. If a citizen is expected to honor the laws and codes of conduct set forth, then so should the government. Instead, they're not exactly setting a good example here, are they?
And btw, there's actually no, "he only did 12 of the 21 years" since he's
still in prison and was
denied parole.
-Tyrion