Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:46 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29894
Location: UK
I still see eye-shadow. And what's with the tight jeans and nearly-new t- shirts? Posers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:00 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Zad wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Zad wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
Their last album had moments, this new stuff is shite. Sorry Stefan, you're on your own!


I don't know their latest... so I really can't say if you're wrong or right... (not on my own yet :P )


They went from being a vaguely average metalcore band who wrote catchy songs to a shitty metalcore band who write bad songs. I think you'll be disappointed... Try The Bled out if you haven't already... http://www.thebledsite.com/


I have 'found in the flood'. its pretty good. 48645312 times better than atreyu at least. only heard a couple songs from them, but they all sucked like a supercharged vacuum. i wouldnt even say they were metalcore. they are emo-core. Hopefully the bubble bursts soon, and all these talentless shitheads end up stacking shelves in the local supermarket.


Amen to that.


Im sure the worst part about having to eventually get real jobs for them will be not being able to wear their faggoth makeup.


Well, no need to be homophobic. :wink:


Image

seems they stopped wearing their pseudo-grim make-up...
but c'mon, many many many bands wear make-up (even if some call it corpse-paint) in the metal scene so there's no reason to bash a band solely on its look... :roll:

NP
Gorath "Toxic"
(Britney Spears cover ! wOOt)


How about if i bash all bands that wear make up?
Or just bands that do it for commercial purposes. That was probably not the original intention with BM, though now some surely do it for commercial gain. *cough*cardle of filth*couch*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:03 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Zad wrote:
I still see eye-shadow. And what's with the tight jeans and nearly-new t- shirts? Posers.


What about the cradle of filth shirt???? poseeeeeers!
Its like Matt Heafy. in every second photo he wears a burzum shirt, but in terrorizer they played him 'key to the gate', and he couldnt get it! poser!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:10 am 
following the reaper wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Zad wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Zad wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
Their last album had moments, this new stuff is shite. Sorry Stefan, you're on your own!


I don't know their latest... so I really can't say if you're wrong or right... (not on my own yet :P )


They went from being a vaguely average metalcore band who wrote catchy songs to a shitty metalcore band who write bad songs. I think you'll be disappointed... Try The Bled out if you haven't already... http://www.thebledsite.com/


I have 'found in the flood'. its pretty good. 48645312 times better than atreyu at least. only heard a couple songs from them, but they all sucked like a supercharged vacuum. i wouldnt even say they were metalcore. they are emo-core. Hopefully the bubble bursts soon, and all these talentless shitheads end up stacking shelves in the local supermarket.


Amen to that.


Im sure the worst part about having to eventually get real jobs for them will be not being able to wear their faggoth makeup.


Well, no need to be homophobic. :wink:


Image

seems they stopped wearing their pseudo-grim make-up...
but c'mon, many many many bands wear make-up (even if some call it corpse-paint) in the metal scene so there's no reason to bash a band solely on its look... :roll:

NP
Gorath "Toxic"
(Britney Spears cover ! wOOt)


How about if i bash all bands that wear make up?
Or just bands that do it for commercial purposes. That was probably not the original intention with BM, though now some surely do it for commercial gain. *cough*cardle of filth*couch*

well, imo, Atreyu are just a bunch of nerdy kids trying to look cool to other nerdy kids that watch Headbanger's Ball... no commercial purpose behind the make-up then...
and I don't think all BM bands (that does not include norse core or gothylike bands !) wear corpse-paint because they lke it but more because it makes 'em look cooler to some BM kids... wait ! that's kind of the same than Atreyu... :wink:

anyway, the "king" of make-up is :
Image
Arthur Brown, Glastonbury Festival 1971

8)

NP
Sick Of It All "Death to Tyrants"
(2006, their new album... first spin but so far, classic SOIA)


EDIT :
MORE ARTHUR BROWN !!!

Image Image Image
all from 1969

and this is modern time AB (that's what too much LSD does to the brain kids :wink: )
Image


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:24 pm
Posts: 3233
Location: America
Stefan wrote:
Image


I'll bet these hacks have never even heard a Smith's album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:24 pm 
Look at the turd in the Underoath shirt! WTF? He's not modeling!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:26 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 6810
Location: lolchair
Eternal Idol wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Image


I'll bet these hacks have never even heard a Smith's album.


Is that a Cradle of Filth shirt I'm seeing there ? Oh man . :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:27 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Stefan wrote:
Image

A photoshoot :D Isn't that where take a few hundreds of pictures and sellect the best few? LOL, I really wonder what the bad ones looked like!! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:28 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29894
Location: UK
The dwarf on the right reminds me of the bloke from The Prodigy...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:31 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Zad wrote:
The dwarf on the right reminds me of the bloke from The Prodigy...

He looks like he can party under my piss-ray without getting wet...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:40 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 7932
Location: Glasgow
Eternal Idol wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Image


I'll bet these hacks have never even heard a Smith's album.

Lucky them.

---

Another candidate for "BEST REVEIEW EVAR"

(lifted from Metal-Archives)

Quote:
In Flames vs Tiffany - 37%
Written by Cheeses_Priced on October 7th, 2004


Formed in 1990 and hailing from Gothenburg, Sweden, IN FLAMES are one of the best-known and highly praised bands in the New Wave of Swedish Death Metal movement. Their third full-length album, Whoracle, was released in 1997 on Nuclear Blast records.

TIFFANY (born Tiffany Renee Darwisch) was the first female artist to reach the number one spot on the billboard charts. She’s best known for the pop tunes she sang in the 1980s, which paved the way for such groups as New Kids on the Block. Her eponymous debut album was released in 1987 when she was still only sixteen years old.

In the interest of better assessing the unique merits and deficiencies of both recordings, I’ll compare both of them across a broad variety of categories. May the best album win!

--------------------------------------------------------

VOCALS

This one’s a pushover. Tiffany is a very talented singer; she appeared on Ed McMahon’s Star Search as a child and so even at the young age of sixteen, she has a good range and a great deal of versatility. Although she comes from a country music background, across the album she shows herself capable of handling a variety of styles. Naturally, her voice is the lynchpin of the album and she performs more than adequately.

In Flames utilize a death metal vocal style… from a technical standpoint, not terribly impressive, and not terribly impressive compared against other death metal singers, either. Anders Fridén has a passable voice, but he’s too monotonous in his inflection. I don’t understand why the band brought in a guy just to do vocals, instead of just having somebody in the band perform them – seems like out of any group of four grown men, at least one of them would have to be able to do death metal vocals better than this guy.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

PRODUCTION

Tiffany’s production is very professionally done, as one would expect from a hit pop album: the recording is crystal clear, everything is perfectly balanced in the listening space, and there are nifty little effects like reverb and such where appropriate. There’s really not much to criticize – I assume the recording was done by well-paid sound engineers.

In Flames, however, are no slouches in this area either. One of the band’s biggest appeals over the course of their career (since their sophomore effort, anyway) has been their full production and powerful rhythm guitar sound. I find that the cymbals sometimes overwhelm some of the other instruments at certain points, but nevertheless, it’s a very good recording.

The deciding factor here is that Whoracle was recorded a full decade after Tiffany, and recording technology had by then come a long way since 1987. This might be partially a matter of taste, but a lot of the synthesizer and drum sounds haven’t held up too well over the years... they may have been top-shelf for the time, but nevertheless objectivity demands that I give this category to the In Flames.

Winner: In Flames – Whoracle

CATCHINESS / SONGWRITING

The primary musical influence on In Flames is Iron Maiden, and listening to this album for a few minutes will allow you to understand why Maiden bothered to hire real singers instead of just having some guy growl into the microphone. No big, soaring choruses here: all the melody is trapped in the riffs, and without a real singer providing another dimension to the music, they begin to sound repetitive. Generally, to me, it feels like all of the songs start off on a great melodic hook but quickly become bogged down with monotony. This is probably partly due to the fact that In Flames adhere closely to just a few songwriting formulas, causing the songs to run together in the listener’s mind. What I really fail to grasp is why the drummer keeps hammering the cymbal on every downbeat. Doesn’t he get tired of that? I know I do.

By contrast, every single song on Tiffany’s debut album is packed with obvious vocal hooks and catchy melodies, and every single song has a distinctive and memorable chorus. It’s certainly no accident that this album spawned two number-one hits (“I Think We’re Alone Now” and “Could’ve Been”) and multiple movie soundtrack appearances. Variation is not neglected either: while the whole album is based in light pop, songs range from cheery up-tempo dance numbers to sadder ballad material. There are a couple of weak points, like “Could’ve Been” (which sounds like it came out of a coffee commercial), and the whole thing’s a little on the light and airy side of course, but nevertheless, the guys who wrote the songs on this album definitely earned their paychecks. Admittedly, the songs wear out their welcome pretty quickly, but that is a problem that In Flames also tend to suffer from, in my opinion.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

MUSICIANSHIP

Without question, the music on Whoracle is a much greater display of raw technical ability. The guitar solos alone are enough to settle the issue, although all of the musicians are very able (if not outstanding by the highest metal standards). There are a couple of solos on Tiffany – including one saxophone solo – but they’re fairly simple, although to their credit the fact that they’re not in every song makes their appearance that much more welcome when they do appear. Other than that, the music is fairly simple, but well-played by the studio musicians. A lot of seems to be electronic, actually… but while electronic musicians never make mistakes, the programmed parts never approach a level of sophistication that can touch the more technical moments on Whoracle.

Winner: In Flames – Whoracle

LYRICS

The lyrics on Tiffany are not generally very impressive. Most of them appear to be about being in love, or falling in love, or falling out of love, or something to that effect, or otherwise seemed to be based around the “misunderstood teen” persona that the album is attempting to project for the singer (i.e. “You keep me hanging like a kid on a corner/Just because you think you can/Don't be so certain that I'll always be there/Just because I've always been”). I’m probably asking too much of pop lyrics though. While they’re not really great reading material I suppose they at least basically make sense and fit in with the music.

…which is more than I can say for Whoracle’s lyrics. An example from “Episode 666”: “Welcome here, the squirrel-wheel begins/fasten the left hand belts/remember not to think too much/and your trip will be numbingly pleasant”.

What? For starters, I have no idea what a “squirrel-wheel” is. Perhaps in Sweden people keep squirrels in cages as pets and give them little wheels to run on, like with hamsters. A “left hand belt” would be a seat belt I guess, although if you’re in the passenger side of a car it’s going to be on your right. Perhaps the belt is “left hand” in the sense of somehow being sinister or satanic, but in that case it still would’ve been clearer to say “left hand seat belt”. As it is, it makes it sound as if the singer is actually addressing people who wear belts on their left hands, a concept so absurd as to be outright insane. Perhaps I should just not think too much and let the trip be numbingly pleasant. Anyhow, I’m not going to go over all the lyrics on the album, but suffice it to say most of them are only about as coherent (or grammatically correct) as the above-quoted passage.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

COVERS

Both albums feature cover songs: In Flames cover Depeche Mode’s “Everything Counts”, Tiffany sings both “I Saw Him Standing There”, a Beatles cover, and “I Think We’re Alone Now”, originally recorded by the sixties bubblegum pop group Tommy and the Shondells.

Honestly, “I Saw Him Standing There” doesn’t come across particularly well, especially compared to the original. If this cover is anything to judge by, when you translate the upbeat rock ‘n’ roll of early Beatles to bright mid-eighties synthesizer sounds, what pops out resembles a cheesy Prince B-side. Definitely one of the weaker songs on the album; stick with the Beatles version. “I Think We’re Alone Now”, on the other hand, is better than the rather monotonous original, if anything. Tiffany’s dance pop version was understandably the first real hit off of the album and remains her best known song; it was even popular enough to inspire a Weird Al parody.

As for In Flames: “Everything Counts” is an early Depeche Mode song, rather more cheerful than the sound they’re usually associated with and as such sort of an odd choice for a metal cover, especially a “death metal” cover. The original is a pretty catchy song, and the lyrics are rather nifty, but In Flames just don’t have the tools at their disposal to adequately represent it – the panoply of synths in the original (which included everything from electronic beeps to an artificial clarinet) are reduced to monotonous distorted guitar sounds, and of course Anders doesn’t actually “sing” any part of the song except for the chorus, so most of the vocal melodies are down the drain as well. An interesting novelty item but not necessarily a great song in itself.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

OVERALL (not an average): Tiffany – Tiffany 72%; In Flames – Whoracle 37%

Tiffany wins it comfortably with her very catchy (if ultimately disposable) brand of eighties pop. Now, Whoracle is not without its merits, to be sure, but ultimately it just doesn’t have what it takes to match the professionalism and consistency of a double platinum pop album. In Flames have a lot to learn if they’re ever going to go as far in the entertainment industry as Tiffany did in her heyday. To their credit, the band seems to have recognized this and made some changes in their sound in their newest material, experimenting with electronic sounds and nu-metal, although unfortunately the results have been mixed at best. Still, even Tiffany didn’t quite reach the top of the charts overnight, so there may be hope for them yet. Best of luck to them.

Standout Tiffany tracks: “Danny”, “Promises Made”, “I Think We’re Alone Now”
Standout Whoracle tracks: “Dialogue with the Stars”, “Episode 666”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:47 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 6810
Location: lolchair
That ^ is stupid because Whoracle is one hell of an album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:49 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29894
Location: UK
Kathaarian wrote:
That ^ is stupid because Whoracle is one hell of an album.


Tiffany is quite good, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:49 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 7932
Location: Glasgow
Kathaarian wrote:
That ^ is stupid because Whoracle is one hell of an album.

I still loled


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:50 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:24 pm
Posts: 3233
Location: America
Radagast wrote:
Eternal Idol wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Image


I'll bet these hacks have never even heard a Smith's album.

Lucky them.

---

Another candidate for "BEST REVEIEW EVAR"

(lifted from Metal-Archives)

Quote:
In Flames vs Tiffany - 37%
Written by Cheeses_Priced on October 7th, 2004


Formed in 1990 and hailing from Gothenburg, Sweden, IN FLAMES are one of the best-known and highly praised bands in the New Wave of Swedish Death Metal movement. Their third full-length album, Whoracle, was released in 1997 on Nuclear Blast records.

TIFFANY (born Tiffany Renee Darwisch) was the first female artist to reach the number one spot on the billboard charts. She’s best known for the pop tunes she sang in the 1980s, which paved the way for such groups as New Kids on the Block. Her eponymous debut album was released in 1987 when she was still only sixteen years old.

In the interest of better assessing the unique merits and deficiencies of both recordings, I’ll compare both of them across a broad variety of categories. May the best album win!

--------------------------------------------------------

VOCALS

This one’s a pushover. Tiffany is a very talented singer; she appeared on Ed McMahon’s Star Search as a child and so even at the young age of sixteen, she has a good range and a great deal of versatility. Although she comes from a country music background, across the album she shows herself capable of handling a variety of styles. Naturally, her voice is the lynchpin of the album and she performs more than adequately.

In Flames utilize a death metal vocal style… from a technical standpoint, not terribly impressive, and not terribly impressive compared against other death metal singers, either. Anders Fridén has a passable voice, but he’s too monotonous in his inflection. I don’t understand why the band brought in a guy just to do vocals, instead of just having somebody in the band perform them – seems like out of any group of four grown men, at least one of them would have to be able to do death metal vocals better than this guy.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

PRODUCTION

Tiffany’s production is very professionally done, as one would expect from a hit pop album: the recording is crystal clear, everything is perfectly balanced in the listening space, and there are nifty little effects like reverb and such where appropriate. There’s really not much to criticize – I assume the recording was done by well-paid sound engineers.

In Flames, however, are no slouches in this area either. One of the band’s biggest appeals over the course of their career (since their sophomore effort, anyway) has been their full production and powerful rhythm guitar sound. I find that the cymbals sometimes overwhelm some of the other instruments at certain points, but nevertheless, it’s a very good recording.

The deciding factor here is that Whoracle was recorded a full decade after Tiffany, and recording technology had by then come a long way since 1987. This might be partially a matter of taste, but a lot of the synthesizer and drum sounds haven’t held up too well over the years... they may have been top-shelf for the time, but nevertheless objectivity demands that I give this category to the In Flames.

Winner: In Flames – Whoracle

CATCHINESS / SONGWRITING

The primary musical influence on In Flames is Iron Maiden, and listening to this album for a few minutes will allow you to understand why Maiden bothered to hire real singers instead of just having some guy growl into the microphone. No big, soaring choruses here: all the melody is trapped in the riffs, and without a real singer providing another dimension to the music, they begin to sound repetitive. Generally, to me, it feels like all of the songs start off on a great melodic hook but quickly become bogged down with monotony. This is probably partly due to the fact that In Flames adhere closely to just a few songwriting formulas, causing the songs to run together in the listener’s mind. What I really fail to grasp is why the drummer keeps hammering the cymbal on every downbeat. Doesn’t he get tired of that? I know I do.

By contrast, every single song on Tiffany’s debut album is packed with obvious vocal hooks and catchy melodies, and every single song has a distinctive and memorable chorus. It’s certainly no accident that this album spawned two number-one hits (“I Think We’re Alone Now” and “Could’ve Been”) and multiple movie soundtrack appearances. Variation is not neglected either: while the whole album is based in light pop, songs range from cheery up-tempo dance numbers to sadder ballad material. There are a couple of weak points, like “Could’ve Been” (which sounds like it came out of a coffee commercial), and the whole thing’s a little on the light and airy side of course, but nevertheless, the guys who wrote the songs on this album definitely earned their paychecks. Admittedly, the songs wear out their welcome pretty quickly, but that is a problem that In Flames also tend to suffer from, in my opinion.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

MUSICIANSHIP

Without question, the music on Whoracle is a much greater display of raw technical ability. The guitar solos alone are enough to settle the issue, although all of the musicians are very able (if not outstanding by the highest metal standards). There are a couple of solos on Tiffany – including one saxophone solo – but they’re fairly simple, although to their credit the fact that they’re not in every song makes their appearance that much more welcome when they do appear. Other than that, the music is fairly simple, but well-played by the studio musicians. A lot of seems to be electronic, actually… but while electronic musicians never make mistakes, the programmed parts never approach a level of sophistication that can touch the more technical moments on Whoracle.

Winner: In Flames – Whoracle

LYRICS

The lyrics on Tiffany are not generally very impressive. Most of them appear to be about being in love, or falling in love, or falling out of love, or something to that effect, or otherwise seemed to be based around the “misunderstood teen” persona that the album is attempting to project for the singer (i.e. “You keep me hanging like a kid on a corner/Just because you think you can/Don't be so certain that I'll always be there/Just because I've always been”). I’m probably asking too much of pop lyrics though. While they’re not really great reading material I suppose they at least basically make sense and fit in with the music.

…which is more than I can say for Whoracle’s lyrics. An example from “Episode 666”: “Welcome here, the squirrel-wheel begins/fasten the left hand belts/remember not to think too much/and your trip will be numbingly pleasant”.

What? For starters, I have no idea what a “squirrel-wheel” is. Perhaps in Sweden people keep squirrels in cages as pets and give them little wheels to run on, like with hamsters. A “left hand belt” would be a seat belt I guess, although if you’re in the passenger side of a car it’s going to be on your right. Perhaps the belt is “left hand” in the sense of somehow being sinister or satanic, but in that case it still would’ve been clearer to say “left hand seat belt”. As it is, it makes it sound as if the singer is actually addressing people who wear belts on their left hands, a concept so absurd as to be outright insane. Perhaps I should just not think too much and let the trip be numbingly pleasant. Anyhow, I’m not going to go over all the lyrics on the album, but suffice it to say most of them are only about as coherent (or grammatically correct) as the above-quoted passage.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

COVERS

Both albums feature cover songs: In Flames cover Depeche Mode’s “Everything Counts”, Tiffany sings both “I Saw Him Standing There”, a Beatles cover, and “I Think We’re Alone Now”, originally recorded by the sixties bubblegum pop group Tommy and the Shondells.

Honestly, “I Saw Him Standing There” doesn’t come across particularly well, especially compared to the original. If this cover is anything to judge by, when you translate the upbeat rock ‘n’ roll of early Beatles to bright mid-eighties synthesizer sounds, what pops out resembles a cheesy Prince B-side. Definitely one of the weaker songs on the album; stick with the Beatles version. “I Think We’re Alone Now”, on the other hand, is better than the rather monotonous original, if anything. Tiffany’s dance pop version was understandably the first real hit off of the album and remains her best known song; it was even popular enough to inspire a Weird Al parody.

As for In Flames: “Everything Counts” is an early Depeche Mode song, rather more cheerful than the sound they’re usually associated with and as such sort of an odd choice for a metal cover, especially a “death metal” cover. The original is a pretty catchy song, and the lyrics are rather nifty, but In Flames just don’t have the tools at their disposal to adequately represent it – the panoply of synths in the original (which included everything from electronic beeps to an artificial clarinet) are reduced to monotonous distorted guitar sounds, and of course Anders doesn’t actually “sing” any part of the song except for the chorus, so most of the vocal melodies are down the drain as well. An interesting novelty item but not necessarily a great song in itself.

Winner: Tiffany – Tiffany

OVERALL (not an average): Tiffany – Tiffany 72%; In Flames – Whoracle 37%

Tiffany wins it comfortably with her very catchy (if ultimately disposable) brand of eighties pop. Now, Whoracle is not without its merits, to be sure, but ultimately it just doesn’t have what it takes to match the professionalism and consistency of a double platinum pop album. In Flames have a lot to learn if they’re ever going to go as far in the entertainment industry as Tiffany did in her heyday. To their credit, the band seems to have recognized this and made some changes in their sound in their newest material, experimenting with electronic sounds and nu-metal, although unfortunately the results have been mixed at best. Still, even Tiffany didn’t quite reach the top of the charts overnight, so there may be hope for them yet. Best of luck to them.

Standout Tiffany tracks: “Danny”, “Promises Made”, “I Think We’re Alone Now”
Standout Whoracle tracks: “Dialogue with the Stars”, “Episode 666”


While funny, it peters out halfway through. Also, I'm no In Flames fan, but that kind of shit has no place on the Archives, and proves O'Sheaman is an immature fuck who should be dropped in a pit of lime. Submit something like that for a band he hates, he'll post it and say it's the greatest thing ever. Try doing that for one of his beloved 80's Rock bands and he'll ban you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:18 pm 
Offline
Banned Mallcore Kiddie

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:02 am
Posts: 645
Location: Here, Now.
Quote:
I can't believe this band hasn't gotten their ass kicked yet. They have proven that all you have to do is write breakdowns to get idiots to love you. If I see one more crusty zit covered bitchpants wearing kid with an Atreyu patch I am gonna smack the shit out of him and his girlfriend that looks like a 12 year old boy. I mean come the fuck on... how can you think this is good! It's boring, overplayed, and dime a dozen. Sing scream, sing scream breakdown, melodic part. I should have just saved the time I took typing this and done a one word review.... "NO." My offer to this band to fight me still stands.... I will smack the fucking eyeshadow out of all your band members, then piss on your ashes. BREAK UP ALREADY.



ROLFMAO~! That's the funniest shit ever. We need that reviewer here! NOW!

God, I'm in a library right now, and I'm about to fucking explode. I keep having to jam my arm in my face, and everyone thinks I'm crying... Technically, I really am. This guy is my fucking god.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:39 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 2007
Location: My sickbed.
I'm amused by the fact that they're wearing tighter pants than I am.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:49 pm 
Carnifex Umbris wrote:
I'm amused by the fact that they're wearing tighter pants than I am.

But your buldge is bigger.

(Baaahahahahahahahaha! Sike! Just kidding. Damn. Calm down...What the?...Hey!...Ow!...Bitch! Fuck!...Ayeeyow! Shit! That hurt! Goddamn.)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:33 pm 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Carnifex Umbris wrote:
I'm amused by the fact that they're wearing tighter pants than I am.


I thought of a reason that guy in the other thread cut his knob off. He wanted to be in a metalcore band, so he had to cut it off to get into the tightest jeans known to man, otherwise no one would have hired him. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29894
Location: UK
It's funny. The old bands used to put cucumbers down their trousers, nowadays they go the opposite way. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group