Metal Reviews :: View topic - PEARL JAM : FAVORITE ALBUM POLL

Call me crazy, but Lost Dogs is my favorite. Some of their greatest songs are their b-sides!

Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. :wink:

Eyesore wrote:

Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. :wink:

it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8)

Stefan wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. :wink:

it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8)

If it's not live, it's a studio album...unless they recorded it in the woods.

Eyesore wrote:

Stefan wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. :wink:

it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8)

If it's not live, it's a studio album...unless they recorded it in the woods.

ok dumbass :wink:

what I mean by a studio album is songs recorded in order to make an album, is it one or several sessions... preferably those sessions will be close to each other and none of the material included in the final cd will have been previously available as b'side or bonus track etc...
Clearly, "Lost Dogs" doesn't fit that all :|

I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway.

This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops:

rio wrote:

Oooh, I'll have to have a look, I've practically forgotten that place exists!

Zad wrote:

rio wrote:

Oooh, I'll have to have a look, I've practically forgotten that place exists!

Music Zone is great. Awful selection metalwise, but what they do have (ie mainstream rock stuff like PJ) is invariably cheaper than you would find it elsewhere.

Except Tescos apparently :?

rio wrote:

I knew you were a man of good taste not like Dumbass Kenny (wink wink wink) 8)

I think the poll is a good indication of the two sides of Pearl Jam. Their first 3 or so albums were good, and then the've had a massive slide since. Ten is their best, followed by Vs. The rest, apart from a few good songs scattered about, sucks balls

Author:	Stefan [ Sun May 14, 2006 5:15 am ]
Post subject:	PEARL JAM : FAVORITE ALBUM POLL
just a poll... I'm in the process of listening to all the PJ albums again.. so far I've had No Code & Yield first (as they're my fav') then Ten & Vs and I was wondering what was this community's opinion on which Pearl Jam album is their finest. As I said in the thread about their new album, my preference goes to No Code but Yield is pretty close... 8) NP Pearl Jam "Vitalogy" (which is much better than I reminded)

Author:	Eyesore [ Sun May 14, 2006 7:07 am ]
Post subject:
Call me crazy, but Lost Dogs is my favorite. Some of their greatest songs are their b-sides!

Author:	Stefan [ Sun May 14, 2006 8:17 am ]
Post subject:
Eyesore wrote: Call me crazy, but Lost Dogs is my favorite. Some of their greatest songs are their b-sides! ok... :roll: but if you had to pick one of their studio albums and claim it to be your fav'... which one would it be ? :roll:

Author:	Eyesore [ Sun May 14, 2006 8:21 am ]
Post subject:
Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way.

Author:	Stefan [ Sun May 14, 2006 8:25 am ]
Post subject:
Eyesore wrote: Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8)

Metal Reviews https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/

PEARL JAM : FAVORITE ALBUM POLL https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=6185	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Eyesore [ Sun May 14, 2006 9:53 am ]
Post subject:
Stefan wrote: Eyesore wrote: Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8) If it's not live, it's a studio album...unless they recorded it in the woods.

Author:	Stefan [ Sun May 14, 2006 10:50 am ]
Post subject:
Eyesore wrote: Stefan wrote: Eyesore wrote: Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8) If it's not live, it's a studio album...unless they recorded it in the woods. ok dumbass what I mean by a studio album is songs recorded in order to make an album, is it one or several sessions... preferably those sessions will be close to each other and none of the material included in the final cd will have been previously available as b'side or bonus track etc... Clearly, "Lost Dogs" doesn't fit that all :\|

Author:	Dead Machine [ Sun May 14, 2006 11:51 am ]
Post subject:
Vitalogy.

Author:	Eyesore [ Sun May 14, 2006 7:00 pm ]
Post subject:
Stefan wrote: Eyesore wrote: Stefan wrote: Eyesore wrote: Vs., I guess, but it's a hard question to answer. Lost Dogs is a studio album, by the way. it isn't... I never considered compilations (even if most material is b'sides, rare tracks etc...) to be sutdio albums. Lost Dogs is great but it's not an album 8) If it's not live, it's a studio album...unless they recorded it in the woods. ok dumbass what I mean by a studio album is songs recorded in order to make an album, is it one or several sessions... preferably those sessions will be close to each other and none of the material included in the final cd will have been previously available as b'side or bonus track etc... Clearly, "Lost Dogs" doesn't fit that all :\| I know what you mean, you turd. I was joking. Don't call me a dumbass again, dumbass!

Author:	Goat [ Sun May 14, 2006 7:07 pm ]
Post subject:
I've only listened to them up to No Code, but I'd have to say Ten, although each one is pretty damn awesome.

Author:	rio [ Mon May 15, 2006 10:03 am ]
Post subject:
I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops:

Author:	Goat [ Mon May 15, 2006 11:22 am ]
Post subject:
rio wrote: I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops: Oooh, I'll have to have a look, I've practically forgotten that place exists!

Author:	rio [ Mon May 15, 2006 11:25 am ]
Post subject:
Zad wrote: rio wrote: I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops: Oooh, I'll have to have a look, I've practically forgotten that place exists! Music Zone is great. Awful selection metalwise, but what they do have (ie mainstream rock stuff like PJ) is invariably cheaper than you would find it elsewhere. Except Tescos apparently :?

Author:	Goat [ Mon May 15, 2006 11:27 am ]
Post subject:
rio wrote: Zad wrote: rio wrote: I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops: Oooh, I'll have to have a look, I've practically forgotten that place exists! Music Zone is great. Awful selection metalwise, but what they do have (ie mainstream rock stuff like PJ) is invariably cheaper than you would find it elsewhere. Except Tescos apparently :? Never found any PJ there. Just Heretic, which is a tad crap.

Author:	Lord Jotun [ Tue May 16, 2006 1:24 pm ]
Post subject:
A tie between the first two, though the rest of their catalogue is no slouch either.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Stefan [ Mon May 15, 2006 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:
rio wrote: I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops: I knew you were a man of good taste not like Dumbass Kenny (wink wink wink) 8)

Author:	Goat [ Mon May 15, 2006 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:
Stefan wrote: rio wrote: I haven't heard them all, but I voted No Code anyway. This thread just reminded me that I do actually own Riot Act... I picked it up for £1.97 at Music Zone, and then completely forgot it existed :oops: I knew you were a man of good taste not like Dumbass Kenny (wink wink wink) 8) Oooh, someone's after a fight.

Author:	rio [ Mon May 15, 2006 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Bwahahahahaha

Author:	Trooper Of Steel [ Wed May 17, 2006 10:05 pm ]
Post subject:
I think the poll is a good indication of the two sides of Pearl Jam. Their first 3 or so albums were good, and then the've had a massive slide since. Ten is their best, followed by Vs. The rest, apart from a few good songs scattered about, sucks balls

Author:	Goat [ Thu May 18, 2006 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:
Trooper Of Steel wrote: I think the poll is a good indication of the two sides of Pearl Jam. Their first 3 or so albums were good, and then the've had a massive slide since. Ten is their best, followed by Vs. The rest, apart from a few good songs scattered about, sucks balls Considering 6 people voted... :roll: