Metal Reviews :: View topic - Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks

The special collector box Radiohead released only as a mail-order item is over-expensive and none of the songs will be available anywhere else. Would you say it's okay to download it for free then?

And, oh, In Rainbows is a good (maybe even great but I still have to give it a little more time to see if it lasts) album! :wub:

Stefan wrote:

Considering they made the main album available for nothing if you wanted, then no, not at all.

Zad wrote:

Stefan wrote:

Considering they made the main album available for nothing if you wanted, then no, not at all.

Is it okay if you buy the cd then? :wink:

The download-version was only 160 kbps, not what I'd call top quality... :unsure:

128kbps is CD quality.

Afro Lint wrote:

128kbps is CD quality.

Isn't FLAC CD quality?

unlike most people, i actually paid a few bucks for the album.

I think 192 kbps is CD quality.

And as for In Rainbows, I plan to pick it up in January. This month, I'm buying either Blur's self-titled album or Gambling With The Devil. I may go with the Blur album just to have something a little different in my music collection.

Author:	Stefan [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks
The special collector box Radiohead released only as a mail-order item is over-expensive and none of the songs will be available anywhere else. Would you say it's okay to download it for free then? And, oh, In Rainbows is a good (maybe even great but I still have to give it a little more time to see if it lasts) album!

Author:	Goat [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:21 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks
Stefan wrote: The special collector box Radiohead released only as a mail-order item is over-expensive and none of the songs will be available anywhere else. Would you say it's okay to download it for free then? And, oh, In Rainbows is a good (maybe even great but I still have to give it a little more time to see if it lasts) album! Considering they made the main album available for nothing if you wanted, then no, not at all.

Author:	Stefan [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks
Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: The special collector box Radiohead released only as a mail-order item is over-expensive and none of the songs will be available anywhere else. Would you say it's okay to download it for free then? And, oh, In Rainbows is a good (maybe even great but I still have to give it a little more time to see if it lasts) album! Considering they made the main album available for nothing if you wanted, then no, not at all. Is it okay if you buy the cd then? The download-version was only 160 kbps, not what I'd call top quality...

Author:	Afro Lint [ Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:37 am ]
Post subject:
128kbps is CD quality.

Author:	Adveser [ Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks
Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: The special collector box Radiohead released only as a mail-order item is over-expensive and none of the songs will be available anywhere else. Would you say it's okay to download it for free then? And, oh, In Rainbows is a good (maybe even great but I still have to give it a little more time to see if it lasts) album! Considering they made the main album available for nothing if you wanted, then no, not at all. Is it okay if you buy the cd then? The download-version was only 160 kbps, not what I'd call top quality... Is that why a AES (Audio Engineering Society) panel held a conference and astudy to conclude that NONE of it's members could tell a damn bit of difference between a CD and an MP3 ripped at 160kbps? Any differnces you notice are al in your mind, the power of suggestion.

Metal Reviews https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/

Radiohead In Rainbows bonus tracks https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=10481	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Dago [ Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:
Afro Lint wrote: 128kbps is CD quality. Isn't FLAC CD quality?

Author:	Stefan [ Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Dago wrote: Afro Lint wrote: 128kbps is CD quality. Isn't FLAC CD quality? Lossless it's called so you're right... I think too much shitty metal must have their eardrums...

Author:	Seinfeld26 [ Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:
I think 192 kbps is CD quality. And as for In Rainbows, I plan to pick it up in January. This month, I'm buying either Blur's self-titled album or Gambling With The Devil. I may go with the Blur album just to have something a little different in my music collection.

Author:	muchojackdaniels [ Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:25 pm ]
Post subject:
downloaded it from their site. i cant even tell the quality isnt "cd quality." unlike most people, i actually paid a few bucks for the album.

Author:	Goat [ Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:11 am ]
Post subject:
muchojackdaniels wrote: unlike most people, i actually paid a few bucks for the album. Gawd bless you.

Author:	Stefan [ Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:
Seinfeld26 wrote: I think 192 kbps is CD quality. And as for In Rainbows, I plan to pick it up in January. This month, I'm buying either Blur's self-titled album or Gambling With The Devil. I may go with the Blur album just to have something a little different in my music collection. Cd quality is FLAC.

Author:	kelly [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:
I love them!! They really fill out the album because the first disc is pretty short so by the time "Videotape" ends I usually want more.

Author:	Stefan [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:52 pm ]
Post subject:
Indeed... I even think I prefer the bonus tracks to the rest of the album...

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/