leee wrote:
It isn't semantics at all anyways. Basically you stated that you didn't see how anyone that like Moonspell wouldn't like this album like your taste and what you like is the only logical path for a Moonspell fan. Then to go one further you make a totally baseless point about it sounding like "newer" stuff where I pointed out that it sounded NOTHING like the Butterfly Fx and Darkness and Hope (true statement if you have those albums) and only a passing nod to the Antidote with the harsh vocals. You did correctly state that it does sound like some of the Symphonic Gothish BM tinged Deamonarch side project, and I pointed out that, that album was 7 years old so hardly "new".
My comment was essentially a rhetorical comment! It wasn't a thought presented as fact, and it's surely didn't require the response of "anyways, get over it, not everyone can love the same things as you"—which was worded intentionally to piss me off, thus my follow-up comment.
You can argue all you want that the new album doesn't sound like the newer Moonspell material, I think it does, but both opinions are subjective. My main point, however, was that it did not sound like Wolfheart, which is fact. It does not.
As for my Daemonarch comment, I never once implied that was a new album, so why you're even commenting that it's 7 years old is beyond me.
Quote:
I think that is for sure "discussing" music. I just didn't call you an idiot or a fag for being wrong where as you choose to insult me and make yourself look like some hopped up Meth freak on the 'net for the first time. Also I didn't narrow the entire discussion down too basically being "you can't be a Moonspell fan if you don't like the new album" which is totally false. You could technially be a big Moonspell fan even if you only like Wolfheart and their ep's but not Irreligous through Darkness and Hope. To be a fan of a band you don't have to love everything they did.
I also never implied that you were not a fan of the band. Your thought process follows no logical progression.