emperorblackdoom wrote:
Quote:
The band submitting to their producer's/label's request to include white boy-rapping in their song is reason enough for me to hate them. Pussies.
Agreed.
A band like the Gathering innovated(Yes they have a female singer). Evanesence merely caters to the mainstream. Plus, they use big words to appear intellectual, but they use them wrong. Writing a lyric like, "You captivate me in resonating ways" is plain embarrassing.
What did The Gathering innovate? Is The Gathering's Mandylion so different from Evanescence's Fallen? No way. Is Fallen so different from their first full-length release, Origin? No way. But...is Mandylion so different from Almost A Dance and Always? The difference is tenfold. Yes, musically they're not very different, but you take away a guttural death metal vocalist and replace him with an angelic female voice that is a HUGE difference. Why isn't anyone claiming The Gathering sold out for mainstream success?
Evanescence played the same style of music these other bands play from day one. The difference?: they achieved mainstream popularity. We see it now with Lacuna Coil. Prior to Comalies being released Lacuna Coil was reverred among the female-fronted metal bands, nary a metal fan had something negative to say. Now the majority opinion is that they've sold out, they're nu-metal, blah-blah-blah. What has changed? Their popularity.
The reason I posed this question is because it drives me insane to hear music fans display negativity towards bands based on their popularity, which is exactly what I hear when people discuss Evanescence.
If you strip away the glitz and glamour that MTV and mainstream media has place upon this band, they're truly not different. They just aren't. Now, I understand people generally may not like this band, but when I ask for reasons people generally can't come up with anything that makes sense. Hence my question.