Eternal Idol wrote:
Roots was a thrash-o-rama, and Against redifined what we know to be modern Thrash!
I suppose it was only a matter of time.
| Metal Reviews https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/ |
|
| Sepultura (pre-Chaos AD) https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7823 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Seinfeld26 [ Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sepultura (pre-Chaos AD) |
People always describe Sepultura as a thrash/death metal hybrid. So what's the overall consensus here? Are they more thrash metal or more death metal? I can't really decide. I used to think of them as full-on death metal. Then I started to think of them as more thrash metal. But now, after seeing how Death is considered death metal, I'm starting to wonder whether they really could be classified as death metal. Though I voted "Thrash Metal." Anyway, as most know, Chaos AD was more death-influenced groove metal (possibly the first album of its kind), Roots was nu-metal, and their Derrick Greene albums were hardcore punk. |
|
| Author: | The_Voice [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ill consider them to be more thrash than death, but death/trhash i believe its more accurate. |
|
| Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I consider them to be more thrash than death, BUT their first 2 releases (Morbid Visions/Bestial Devastation)I consider them to be old-school death metal. Could they be the first releases witht blast beats? But that is besides the point, Schizophrenia, Beneath the Remains, and Arise are definetly thrash. (but death/thrash is a better name) Chaos AD is a groovy thrash cd that is not bad, just not what I expected after Arise. I hate Roots, plain and simple. The post-Max Cavalera I don't like either, but I hear their newest one is pretty good. On a different note, does anyone like their DVD? (of the older material obviously) |
|
| Author: | ganeshaRules [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thrash/death is the best way to define them, but if I have to choose, they were more thrash than death. |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thrash. |
|
| Author: | Azrael [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
what DVD? the Barcelona thing? IT'S AVAILABLE ON DVD?! anyways, i think of the frist two as death/thrash, though i'm not sure if there was death metal back then. proto-death? the last two before Chaos AD were thrash, and excellent thrash at that. |
|
| Author: | rio [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Azrael wrote: the last two before Chaos AD were thrash, and excellent thrash at that. Yeah, but then the very early stuff is Death to me. So both could be right but I voted death to balance it out. |
|
| Author: | Radagast [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Morbid Visions - Death Schizophrenia - Death/Thrash Beneath the Remains - Thrash/Death Arise - Thrash |
|
| Author: | Jürgen [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bestial Devastation and Morbid Visions were basic South American black/death. From Schizophrenia onwards they were thrash with elements of death metal. From Chaos A.D. onwards they have been trash. |
|
| Author: | Dago [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jürgen wrote: Bestial Devastation and Morbid Visions were basic South American black/death.
From Schizophrenia onwards they were thrash with elements of death metal. From Chaos A.D. onwards they have been trash. The most accurate description, and from Chaos A.D. onwards they are truly TRASH! |
|
| Author: | Metalhead_Bastard [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmmm...I think in Arise the death metal element is still there-I agree with Rad though. Take the title track os Arise, the intro is death metal through and through when it all just bursts into full on speed, albeit with a thrash edge-but of the first 4 thats the only one where when describing it I'd merely say thrash. |
|
| Author: | Mintrude [ Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Total thrash |
|
| Author: | IronGuardian [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The_Voice wrote: Ill consider them to be more thrash than death, but death/trhash i believe its more accurate.
I agree. A lot of the more extreem thrash metal bands were on the cusp between thrash and death. I would consider their first full length , Morbid Visions, to be death metal but with every album after that they moved closer to thrash. Arise was 100% thrash in my opinion. |
|
| Author: | DevilsAlwaysCry [ Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think they had more grooves in their music then most thrash metal bands and the vocals were more death metal then thrash. I voted death metal, but I think it goes either way. |
|
| Author: | Eternal Idol [ Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Roots was a thrash-o-rama, and Against redifined what we know to be modern Thrash! |
|
| Author: | Radagast [ Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Eternal Idol wrote: Roots was a thrash-o-rama, and Against redifined what we know to be modern Thrash!
I suppose it was only a matter of time.
|
|
| Author: | Jürgen [ Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Eternal Idol wrote: Roots was a thrash-o-rama, and Against redifined what we know to be modern Thrash!
POSSESSED BY KEN |
|
| Author: | Trooper Of Steel [ Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Everything before Beneath The Remains was death metal...IMO |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|