Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 1:44 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   

True Metal, Genre or not
Yes 17%  17%  [ 4 ]
No 83%  83%  [ 19 ]
Total votes : 23
Author Message
 Post subject: Is True Metal a Genre?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:39 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: The Abyss
Have seen this genre being coined for bands that play heavy and/or power metal. I wouldn't classify "True Metal" as a genre as those bands could be classified under heavy/power metal. Agreed there are times when genres are subjective. So, how many of you would actually classify a band under a genre called True Metal and what would be the criteria for it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is True Metal a Genre?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:01 am 
Thy Serpent wrote:
Have seen this genre being coined for bands that play heavy and/or power metal. I wouldn't classify "True Metal" as a genre as those bands could be classified under heavy/power metal. Agreed there are times when genres are subjective. So, how many of you would actually classify a band under a genre called True Metal and what would be the criteria for it?

True metal is something made up by elitists that wish the lump the bands they like into some category that deems them superior to others.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is True Metal a Genre?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:14 am 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 3561
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
Thy Serpent wrote:
Have seen this genre being coined for bands that play heavy and/or power metal. I wouldn't classify "True Metal" as a genre as those bands could be classified under heavy/power metal. Agreed there are times when genres are subjective. So, how many of you would actually classify a band under a genre called True Metal and what would be the criteria for it?

True metal is something made up by elitists that wish the lump the bands they like into some category that deems them superior to others.


Me and Eyesore do agree. Though I believe Manowar should be in the True Metal category, as they are the kings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:14 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 8992
Location: Husker Nation
I'm guilty of this for bands like Manowar and Hammerfall. I have a shit ton of CD's that would qualify as "Power/Prog/Heavy," so I try to categorize them by the mood the music gives off. This helps me decide what I feel like putting on my iPod a little easier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:26 am 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:11 am
Posts: 3884
Location: From the sunshine state of Euphoria
True metal is somewhat a subjective term.I believe it was designed to show that metal from the 80's style is back and is seperate from nu metal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:25 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:10 am
Posts: 1763
Location: USA and Asia
I agree with Ken, its not a genre, it is just something that elitest kids use to show they missed it the first time around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:30 pm 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:24 pm
Posts: 362
Location: Finland
Yes I do think there is a trait that could be refered to as True, and these bands could be called True Metal. It describes bands like Manowar, Lost Horizon, Hammerfall etc. whether people agree that they are actually true or not, as thats of less importance. True mainly means to have a true "look", being true mainly in appearance etc. (though I don't see why the rule must exclude bands that could be said to be profoundly true either for that matter.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:26 pm 
FrigidSymphony wrote:
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

Which is subjective, meaning it's not a genre.

Next.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:36 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

Which is subjective, meaning it's not a genre.

Next.


Yes, it isn't a genre. Also it is subjective. For me CoB aren't true, whereas for someone else they are.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:12 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 3561
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

Which is subjective, meaning it's not a genre.

Next.


He never said it was a genre.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:15 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 3581
Location: Cardiff, Wales
I'll use the term to describe a band, but not in the context of a genre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:04 pm 
Brahm_K wrote:
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

Which is subjective, meaning it's not a genre.

Next.

He never said it was a genre.

So he's speaking out of context then?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:07 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
Brahm_K wrote:
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
True metal is for me a definition of pureness and quality rather than musical classification. A death metal band can also be true.

Which is subjective, meaning it's not a genre.

Next.

He never said it was a genre.

So he's speaking out of context then?


No, I said that true is a definition of pureness and quality rather than a musical classification. Musical classification is genre indication, so for me True Metal isn't a genre.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:36 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:10 am
Posts: 1763
Location: USA and Asia
Scion wrote:
Yes I do think there is a trait that could be refered to as True, and these bands could be called True Metal. It describes bands like Manowar, Lost Horizon, Hammerfall etc. whether people agree that they are actually true or not, as thats of less importance. True mainly means to have a true "look", being true mainly in appearance etc. (though I don't see why the rule must exclude bands that could be said to be profoundly true either for that matter.)


But Hammerfall sounds like Dokken (1st 2 albums not the crap Ken likes from them) mixed with Accept.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:58 am 
leee wrote:
Scion wrote:
Yes I do think there is a trait that could be refered to as True, and these bands could be called True Metal. It describes bands like Manowar, Lost Horizon, Hammerfall etc. whether people agree that they are actually true or not, as thats of less importance. True mainly means to have a true "look", being true mainly in appearance etc. (though I don't see why the rule must exclude bands that could be said to be profoundly true either for that matter.)

But Hammerfall sounds like Dokken (1st 2 albums not the crap Ken likes from them) mixed with Accept.....

You die. Dokken has one bad album: Shadowland (or whatever that turdfest was called).


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:34 am 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Edmonton, Canada
It's a hardline extremist viewpoint. Most conservative metalheads don't interpret heavy metal that way. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:53 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:24 am
Posts: 2826
Location: U.S.
I used to think of true metal as a genre for bands like Manowar, Edguy, Hammerfall, etc., but now that I think of it they're really just heavy metal bands that are especially tr00 to the "spirit of metal".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:05 am 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:11 am
Posts: 3884
Location: From the sunshine state of Euphoria
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
leee wrote:
Scion wrote:
Yes I do think there is a trait that could be refered to as True, and these bands could be called True Metal. It describes bands like Manowar, Lost Horizon, Hammerfall etc. whether people agree that they are actually true or not, as thats of less importance. True mainly means to have a true "look", being true mainly in appearance etc. (though I don't see why the rule must exclude bands that could be said to be profoundly true either for that matter.)

But Hammerfall sounds like Dokken (1st 2 albums not the crap Ken likes from them) mixed with Accept.....

You die. Dokken has one bad album: Shadowland (or whatever that turdfest was called).


Correction they had 2 bad ones Shadowlife and Dysfunctional.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:20 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:10 am
Posts: 1763
Location: USA and Asia
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
leee wrote:
Scion wrote:
Yes I do think there is a trait that could be refered to as True, and these bands could be called True Metal. It describes bands like Manowar, Lost Horizon, Hammerfall etc. whether people agree that they are actually true or not, as thats of less importance. True mainly means to have a true "look", being true mainly in appearance etc. (though I don't see why the rule must exclude bands that could be said to be profoundly true either for that matter.)

But Hammerfall sounds like Dokken (1st 2 albums not the crap Ken likes from them) mixed with Accept.....

You die. Dokken has one bad album: Shadowland (or whatever that turdfest was called).


I quit after Back for the Attack. No G. Lynch, no Dokken, period and Hammerfall totally sound like early Dokken.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group