Metal Reviews
https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/

Eyesore 1-0 Blabbermouth
https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6708
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Radagast [ Tue Jul 04, 2006 11:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Eyesore 1-0 Blabbermouth

Refering to Blabbermouth's shitty review (9/10, though) for Cellador's debut:
Quote:
COMMENT | The Reviewer And YOU Are Both Retarded!
posted by : Eyesore
7/4/2006 5:01:12 PM


The score is perfect, this album is killer, but the review is lame as always:

"The songs? Every one is a highlight. Few albums maintain this level of consistency from track to track. Honestly, pick a song, any song. Largely unconcerned with tempo variation, the group attacks with a vengeance from beginning to end; every chorus is memorable and the intensity level never wanes. Whether it is the harmony vocals on the chorus of "Wakening" or the triumphant melodies of "No Chances Lost" and "A Sign Far Beyond", the quality level remains sky high."

Wow! Every one is a highlight! Thus, no need to actually write anything that shows you listened to the album, just some vague references to "harmony vocals on the chorus" of one song and the "triumphant melodies" of two others. What is a triumphant melody exactly? And, for the record, the singer sounds NOTHING like fucking Bruce Dickinson, nice name-drop, though. Asshole.

As for you turds that post here, this band sounds like Kiske/Hansen-era Helloween. Kiske is the vocal comparison, that era of Helloween is the musical comparison. Those fit the closest. Just because Hot Topic is carrying the new Dragonforce album doesn't mean shit, you still know NOTHING about music.

Now go delete you MP3s of this album and BUY it. It's like $9.99! Surely that new spiked pleather wristband at Hot Topic can wait.

Right on, tell it sister! :D

Author:  Eyesore [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:21 am ]
Post subject: 

Hahahahaha! I hate Blabbermouth's reviewers with a passion! They flat out suck!

Did you see this one?

Quote:
COMMENT | Keith, You're An Asshole!
posted by : Eyesore
7/3/2006 3:19:32 AM


What the fuck are risky vocals? Vocals that might explode? Vocals that if not properly strapped in may fall over and crush you? Vocals that if driven too fast may unexpectedly lose control? Cut the shit.

"...triangulated somewhere between PAIN OF SALVATION, NEVERMORE, DEADSOUL TRIBE and EVERGREY."

How about this: "...triangulated somewhere between ZERO HOUR, REDEMPTION, STRIDE and DEGREE ABSOLUTE."

There you go! Now edit your review with that. Stop WRITING and start LISTENING, Keithy! Your reviews are worded well, but they tend to say nothing.


Or this one?

Quote:
COMMENT | Let's Break It Down...
posted by : Eyesore
5/22/2006 6:09:10 PM


01. Nu-Metal is born.
02. Spineshank shows up.
03. Nu-Metal dies.
04. Spineshank disappears.
05. Metalcoremo is born.
06. Silent Civilian shows up.
07. Metalcoremo dies (a prediction with a guarantee, I'm a psychic)
08. Silent Civilian disappears (a prediction with a guarantee, I'm a pyschic)
09. [Insert new genre force-fed by corporate mainstream cock-gobblers] is born.
10. [Insert new bands featuring ex-Spineshank/Silent Civilian members here] shows up.


Quote:
COMMENT | Thrash? You Fags!
posted by : Eyesore
5/23/2006 12:52:30 AM


You disgrace REAL thrash bands by insisting this shit is thrash! What kind of horse shit is that! It's as bad as you teenage fucks insisting that Chaos A.D. is a nu-metal album! Burn My Eyes is a nu-metal album! Vulgar Display Of Power is a nu-metal! Get the fuck out! Clueless asshats.


The Saviours review was the best:

Quote:
COMMENT | Good Band!
posted by : Eyesore
5/15/2006 12:48:48 AM


Their Warship EP is good, 2 out of the 3 songs, at least. I've heard two tracks from this album, I like 'em. Look forward to it.

37th post! Faggots.



COMMENT | Yeah!
posted by : Eyesore
5/15/2006 2:26:03 PM


First post!

Morons.



COMMENT | That's Right!
posted by : Eyesore
5/16/2006 2:56:36 AM


Shitbags.



COMMENT | Assholes!
posted by : Eyesore
5/16/2006 7:27:47 PM


First post!


DEF LEPPARD!!!!1!1!!one!!11!!11!!!eleven!1!!!



COMMENT | and ...
posted by : john_h11
5/17/2006 1:09:41 AM


the only post for a day as well! Cool cover.




www.remantsofreason.com



COMMENT | Get Out Of My...Uh...Review...Area...Thingy...
posted by : Eyesore
5/17/2006 7:36:35 PM


Asshole!

First post!



COMMENT | This Band Sucks!
posted by : Eyesore
5/18/2006 11:42:59 PM


Kelly Clarkson KO1

You crusty turd-lickers! Eat poo!



COMMENT | First Post!
posted by : Eyesore
5/18/2006 11:43:28 PM


FUCK YEAH!



COMMENT | These Guys Suck!
posted by : Eyesore
5/19/2006 7:27:23 PM


Bunch of poser faggots!

K-FED!!!111!!!1!!!1!1!!!!!11!one!!11!



COMMENT | Loothers!
posted by : Eyesore
5/22/2006 12:28:43 AM


That is all.

First post.

:lol:

Author:  Orion [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Eyesore 1-0 Blabbermouth

Radagast wrote:
Refering to Blabbermouth's shitty review (9/10, though) for Cellador's debut:
Quote:
COMMENT | The Reviewer And YOU Are Both Retarded!
posted by : Eyesore
7/4/2006 5:01:12 PM


The score is perfect, this album is killer, but the review is lame as always:

"The songs? Every one is a highlight. Few albums maintain this level of consistency from track to track. Honestly, pick a song, any song. Largely unconcerned with tempo variation, the group attacks with a vengeance from beginning to end; every chorus is memorable and the intensity level never wanes. Whether it is the harmony vocals on the chorus of "Wakening" or the triumphant melodies of "No Chances Lost" and "A Sign Far Beyond", the quality level remains sky high."

Wow! Every one is a highlight! Thus, no need to actually write anything that shows you listened to the album, just some vague references to "harmony vocals on the chorus" of one song and the "triumphant melodies" of two others. What is a triumphant melody exactly? And, for the record, the singer sounds NOTHING like fucking Bruce Dickinson, nice name-drop, though. Asshole.

As for you turds that post here, this band sounds like Kiske/Hansen-era Helloween. Kiske is the vocal comparison, that era of Helloween is the musical comparison. Those fit the closest. Just because Hot Topic is carrying the new Dragonforce album doesn't mean shit, you still know NOTHING about music.

Now go delete you MP3s of this album and BUY it. It's like $9.99! Surely that new spiked pleather wristband at Hot Topic can wait.

Right on, tell it sister! :D



Ha, Bruce Dickinson, way to set things straight Ken.

Author:  noodles [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:58 am ]
Post subject: 

I only hear Pain of Salvation in Wastefall, mostly because their use of weird melodies/rhythms doesn't so much entertain me as give me a headache. maybe a bit of Nevermore/Zero Hour in their riffs... :?

Author:  MetalStorm [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:24 am ]
Post subject: 

I can see it.Eyesore on Bill O'Reilly telling people what real metal is :lol: :lol:

Author:  Eyesore [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:53 am ]
Post subject: 

MetalStorm wrote:
I can see it.Eyesore on Bill O'Reilly telling people what real metal is :lol: :lol:

Mainly I'm just totally overdoing it because it's Blabbermouth and it's funny. I don't defend myself, I just talk shit! Hahaha.

I definitely don't hear Pain Of Salvation in Wastefall. I think they fall right in with those bands I mentioned.

Author:  Listen2Anata [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

The rant about risky vocals just actually made me laugh out loud at work, now everyone thinks im weird, excellent stuff!Blabbermouth=owned

Author:  CĂș Chulainn [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

hahaha

Author:  Trooper Of Steel [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Just went to the website (which has a nu-metal feel to it, IMO) and selected a few recent reviews at random...

Wow, such absolute trash

This reviewer, Keith Bergman, seems to cop a lot of stick from just about everyone. Its really quite amusing to read some of the comments people have made about his terrible reviews....

Author:  Eyesore [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

Keith is one of those reviewers that you know doesn't listen to the album before reviewing it. He reviews it as he scans it. He's extremely vague and nonsensical 99% of the time. . I mean, in his review of The New Black he said the title track was "directionless." WTF? The song is a very structured song! Directionless? Pffft!

Author:  noodles [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think he meant the instrumental break that doesn't really do much.

Author:  Eyesore [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

noodles wrote:
I think he meant the instrumental break that doesn't really do much.

It's possible, but that's hardly the song, just the ending.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/