Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:43 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: Accept vs Saxon
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:41 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
Let's try now another Clash of the Titans with those Two champions that represent heavy metal at its most rock'n'roll !

Udo vs Biff,Restless&Wild vs Denim&Leather;hard to chose?

I can't vote here because i only vaguely heard some songs from Accept(and don't own any album) while i'm a Saxon fan(i own nearly every album).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:18 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:49 pm
Posts: 2507
Location: Michigan
Metal at its most rocking. Hmmm well neither of these bands even come close to matching Savage, Motorhead, or the almighty Raven.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:57 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 7932
Location: Glasgow
Tough one, but I'd need to say Saxon, probably because I've heard more of their stuff. Saying that, 1985-1995 was more or less a complete abortion as far as Saxon are concerned.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:29 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 3561
I'm going with Saxon here. The Strong Arm of the Law is just an incredible album, and the rest is very good as well (excepting, as Radagast says, that 86-95 period). Accept still rules, just not as much so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:40 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:21 am
Posts: 3538
Location: Mexico
accept


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:41 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:24 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Indiana
Saxon, though both kick ass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:45 am 
Offline
Metal Lord

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:55 pm
Posts: 624
Location: USA (Wincheter, TN.)
Saxon.. but honestly have not devoted enuff time to either band :(
Need more hours in a day or days in a week :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:08 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 1307
Location: south
I've always wondered how come Accept aren't really discussed on these boards. It seems that many people are not that familiar with them, which is a shame. I remember a time when I used to consider Accept the 3rd greatest classic heavy metal band, surpassed only by Priest and Maiden. I'm not sure if I'd rank them so high anymore, but I definitely take them over Saxon anytime.
As for the vocals, I think Udo completely destroys Biff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:12 am 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 271
Location: Sweden
Saxon. I really love both, but Saxon just has a bigger and more impressive body of work. Larger amount of "classic" songs as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:59 am 
Offline
Metal Fighter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:22 am
Posts: 268
Location: Cyprus
Another pointless comparison! Accept are the fathers of edgy German metal, Saxon are one of the premier nwobhm acts! It's like asking which genre people like best! Anyway, my vote goes to both, Denim & Leather, Restless and Wild, Crusader are amongst my all time faves. And also Udo's voice is simply unique!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:15 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
I want some more opinions about these two bands,come on metalheads!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:59 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 7932
Location: Glasgow
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:44 pm 
Saxon sucks
Accept, dont accept this shit


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:00 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:36 pm 
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:36 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
MetalCiprian wrote:
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Don't give me your problems!!!!! :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:13 pm 
stub wrote:
MetalCiprian wrote:
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Don't give me your problems!!!!! :evil:


He Knows You Know, 1983... :roll:

and on the subject of the thread, Saxon has bigger historical value, better songs and a better singer... Accept is still good but not as good as Saxon is...


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:53 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
T.I.E. wrote:
stub wrote:
MetalCiprian wrote:
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Don't give me your problems!!!!! :evil:


He Knows You Know, 1983... :roll:

and on the subject of the thread, Saxon has bigger historical value, better songs and a better singer... Accept is still good but not as good as Saxon is...


Par Belenos,ce garcon m'etonnera toujours!!!!! :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:47 am 
stub wrote:
T.I.E. wrote:
stub wrote:
MetalCiprian wrote:
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Don't give me your problems!!!!! :evil:


He Knows You Know, 1983... :roll:

and on the subject of the thread, Saxon has bigger historical value, better songs and a better singer... Accept is still good but not as good as Saxon is...


Par Belenos,ce garcon m'etonnera toujours!!!!! :shock:


:? pour la référence ou pour l'avis ???

et sinon, plus fort que Saxon et Accept il y avait bien sûr Baron Rojo ! :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:37 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:41 am
Posts: 1088
Location: poser's paradise(france)
T.I.E. wrote:
stub wrote:
T.I.E. wrote:
stub wrote:
MetalCiprian wrote:
stub wrote:
Radagast wrote:
Well as Asgardlord says, its not the most compatible of comparisons. Now if you'd said Raven vs Saxon, we might be getting somewhere.


First of all ,Accept &Saxon are quite close,they began at the same time,they toured together,they play quite comparable music.

then,even if it was Morbid Angel vs Queen,you can still say which one you prefer and why,and that's all this thread is about,so what the hell's the problem?

i dont think u understand the problem, man


Don't give me your problems!!!!! :evil:


He Knows You Know, 1983... :roll:

and on the subject of the thread, Saxon has bigger historical value, better songs and a better singer... Accept is still good but not as good as Saxon is...


Par Belenos,ce garcon m'etonnera toujours!!!!! :shock:


:? pour la référence ou pour l'avis ???

et sinon, plus fort que Saxon et Accept il y avait bien sûr Baron Rojo ! :twisted:


C'est bien ce groupe? Eskil faut commencer avec Volumen Brutal?Ca ressemble a koi?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group