Hey! Calm down everybody! A classic? This album? That's nothing more than the 4th or 5th league of Metal. Come on! Gimme a break! How can you call this thing a classic? Despite the fact that it has added literally nothing into the genre, it's one of the worst albums in the history of Metal. Or perhaps we shouldn't put it into the drawer labeled 'Metal' at all?
OK. Metal Icarus is fine, but the rest? It's not about Matos' voice, beacuse I think that more gentle and smooth voices work fine in music. It's about all the melodies, all the happy stuff that makes the listener puke. Don't want to offend anybody, don't get me wrong, but didn't you forget about the real classics? The albums which created, founded and enriched the genre? Sure, we can call the first Rhapsody a classic album, but what's the point? I think that first you should write about stuff about existence the average metal fan isn't aware of! Where are the reviews of Manilla Road, Liege Lord, Virgin Steele, Cacophony, Metal Church etc.?
And then a mall-core dude reads such reviews of 'classic' albums like mentioned here Angra, and thinks that this is metal, and that's the way it should be played & perceived. I don't know what's the situation in the USA, but here in Poland there are hordes of kindermetalheads which are boasting about their Iron Maiden T-shirts but in fact they have nothing constructive to say about things they listen to. You know, it's the situation like you have a guy who has been listening to Slayer for 15 years, although he is 12. Lots of such kids walk the streets and say that Marylin Manson is Heavy Metal, and so on.
Webzines are not only to introduce the albums to the broader public. They should have an educational role, and get younger people more familiar with Metal.
Wow, that's pretty long
