Eyesore wrote:
But you are spoiled. That's a fact.
I don't see why being spoiled is a bad thing, I mean isn't that just a sign of abundance? We who are fortunate enough to live in industrialized, comparably rich countries are spoiled when it comes to food and drinking water, a luxury a large portion of the world cannot afford. Is that a negative thing? Would we be better off poor?
Quote:
Some fans may appreciate the music more, but in general the LOVE of music is minimal compared to even just 10 years ago, let alone 15 or 20.
These are the sort of statements that I personally would be very careful to make, especially as it attempts to measure and quantify something which can be neither quantified nor measured (love of music).
We may have loved music more when we were younger than we do now, but that has nothing to do with either piracy or availability, but rather age.
Quote:
Even those, like yourself, that buys albums, you still have a lot that you've downloaded, right? You don't think that affects the band?
Directly, no. If we wish to keep things factual, then loss of sales is the only factor that affects bands in this way. Piracy is a possible cause for loss of sales, but one I have not seen any reliable independent study proven. Negative reviews can also be a cause.
Comparing "kids today" with kids when I was young and just started to appreciate music (early 80's), I can tell you that they own more legally purchased music than I ever did. The only difference is the internet which provides them with more information about bands and more copied music. There's one fact that a lot of people tend to forget: kids are poor.