noodles wrote:
for me the atmosphere really isn't worth it. Meshuggah probably pull off the "sounding inhuman" atmosphere best, but even in their case it still makes the music really tedious most of the time. i'd rather bands just use production/recording techniques that actually sound good than try to capture some sort of sci-fi or machine-like mood.
A lot of bands fail at it, I think. Hypocrisy's s/t for one, and I actually can't stand Meshuggah at all. But a band like Septic Flesh pulls it off beautifully in my opinion. The only way I can currently think to describe it beyond technical aspects (sorry a little sleep deprived these days) is that, same as with HoB and a few other bands, they are capable of fully integrating the subject matter of a song or album into the music itself so that you don't even have to know the lyrics to understand what the band had in mind.
A band like Meshuggah's music doesn't tell a story. To me there's a difference between simply sounding "mechanical" to fit a sci-fi-ish feel and actually making your music into the perfect soundtrack for the story your lyrics or whatnot tell. There's a togetherness (among many other things) that Meshuggah lacks.
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Not exactly, I was pointing out how different musical styles have different approaches to transmitting what it is they want to.
Ah, I see what you mean, but while I agree in some cases I just can't really, in good conscience, apply that to certain genres like metalcore or the various modern "-core"s.
For example, myself I rarely listen to anything other than metal, typically preferring to stick with black, thrash, and old school dm for the most part, but when I do its usually classical or folk music. Most other genres just don't sit well with me and don't give me the same intensity and musical "fullness" and power that metal or classical (and then only in composers like Rachmaninoff, Wagner, Beethoven, Grieg, Halvorsen etc.) give me.
However, even though I wouldn't sit down and listen to blues or jazz on my own I can still appreciate both genres and what they strive to achieve despite the fact that they don't provide me with what I typically look for in music.
Bands like Protest the Hero, however, pretty much embody everything I despise from the music itself down to the typical metalcore attitude. There's a kind of cheapness to their sound, a bit like the whole hipster "post-blahblahblah" trend these days. Protest the Hero vocals sound like a cross between a whiny Linkin Park fan deciding to "step it up a notch", and a Blink 182 or Offspring fan who decided to combine an epic phail attempt at traditional metal vocals with "emotional" boy band vocals. The music itself partly suffers from Dragonforce syndrome: ie. wanking for the sake of wanking without any quality riffs whatsoever. They're one of those bands who seem to want to come off as technical just because they can play slightly varied note patterns over and over again real fast, ma! Take that to the extreme and you get something like Orthrelm's OV at which point you just want to shoot yourself in the eye socket in a desperate attempt to stop your ears from bleeding. Fortunately Protest the Hero haven't taken it that far but have still managed to produce needless music without much substance or anything particularly interesting at all. Basically take the above description and add in some breakdowns and voila! "omg b3st album of teh yearz0rz!"
Maybe I'm being a "pretentious" ass again, but that's the way I see it.
Goat wrote:
Are you any good at writing reviews, IronD? We could use another elitist around here now that people are reviewing Pearl Jam and stuff. Not an official offer, you understand, just wondering...
I've only ever written one album review to be honest, and have more experience writing book (mostly history) reviews than music reviews. So I'm not entirely sure I'd be what you'd be looking for.