Eyesore wrote:
First off, leee didn't see the documentary. I won't listen to a word he says because it's based on nothing.
Well, despite not having seen it he's right in this case. There's no way around it: This documentary was made by people that didn't understand their subject matter. Are you going to say that they did? And if not, how can you possibly justify making a documentary this serious about a subject you don't understand?
Quote:
Secondly, I don't like pop. That was a lame attempt at an insult. Let's try to not go there again.
Hardly much of an insult. How about this- you have a rather patronising manner and give the impression that you think everyone else is much stupider than you? That's an insult, but we don't have to go there again unless you want to...
Quote:
And finally, it is the same documentary, to my knowledge. It was not accusatory. It wasn't balanced perfectly with idiots like Glen Benton as the opposing opinion, but it was not a documentary that said "METAL MAKES PEOPLE MURDER!" It was a look into things such as murder, rape and satanism, and the relationship it may have with death/black metal that glorifies such things.
No, it was the story of an innocent young boy whose life turned to shit as soon as he discovere DEATH METAL MUSIC (Hiss) And it seemed like they went to a lot of trouble to find the people that would provide the least compelling opposing opinion.
Quote:
And there is a relationship there. If you're into satan and like to mutilate people, would you not be drawn to music that glorifies such things? Maybe not, but denying the correlation is kind of naive.
This is true. Murderers may well be drawn to metal, but they are not created by it. This is pretty self-evident, but it's exactly the type of thing the program
failed to realise, or discuss.