| Metal Reviews https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/ |
|
| The Sex Pistols Are Krieg https://www.metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5369 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The Sex Pistols Are Krieg |
Ha! |
|
| Author: | Fingon [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
sex pistols<the average turd :evil: |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fingon wrote: sex pistols<the average turd :evil:
Wrong! |
|
| Author: | Dago [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser |
|
| Author: | Eyesore [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dago wrote: SP=Overrated
Sid Vicious=Loser They're legendary and deservedly so, but they weren't very good at all. |
|
| Author: | Stefan [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dago wrote: SP=Overrated
Sid Vicious=Loser Sailorman speaks the truth 8) NP Tom Waits "Mule Variations" (ist Krieg) |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dago wrote: SP=Overrated
Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. |
|
| Author: | Stefan [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. as you wish... but I consider the Sex Pistols to be the Boy's Band of the mid/late seventies' punk scene... 
|
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. as you wish... but I consider the Sex Pistols to be the Boy's Band of the mid/late seventies' punk scene... Why? I'm not as big an expert of the mid/late seventies' punk scene as you are, but they were massively influential and wrote some great songs. Anyone liking Venom who doesn't like them is just foolish. |
|
| Author: | Dago [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. Fine ill change the avatar.. |
|
| Author: | Stefan [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. as you wish... but I consider the Sex Pistols to be the Boy's Band of the mid/late seventies' punk scene... Why? I'm not as big an expert of the mid/late seventies' punk scene as you are, but they were massively influential and wrote some great songs. Anyone liking Venom who doesn't like them is just foolish. there were much rawer or exciting bands in that scene... The Ruts, The Damned, The Clash, Wire, The Vibrators, The Jam, among others... check them out 8) |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. as you wish... but I consider the Sex Pistols to be the Boy's Band of the mid/late seventies' punk scene... Why? I'm not as big an expert of the mid/late seventies' punk scene as you are, but they were massively influential and wrote some great songs. Anyone liking Venom who doesn't like them is just foolish. there were much rawer or exciting bands in that scene... The Ruts, The Damned, The Clash, Wire, The Vibrators, The Jam, among others... check them out 8) The Damned, The Clash, The Vibrators all very good. The Jam I don't like that much, not a huge Paul Weller fan. Wire and the Ruts I shall look into, ta muchly. And you ignored my Venom point |
|
| Author: | Stefan [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Stefan wrote: Zad wrote: Dago wrote: SP=Overrated Sid Vicious=Loser I was going to start an argument, but then I looked at your avatar and realised I shouldn't take your opinions seriously. as you wish... but I consider the Sex Pistols to be the Boy's Band of the mid/late seventies' punk scene... Why? I'm not as big an expert of the mid/late seventies' punk scene as you are, but they were massively influential and wrote some great songs. Anyone liking Venom who doesn't like them is just foolish. there were much rawer or exciting bands in that scene... The Ruts, The Damned, The Clash, Wire, The Vibrators, The Jam, among others... check them out 8) The Damned, The Clash, The Vibrators all very good. The Jam I don't like that much, not a huge Paul Weller fan. Wire and the Ruts I shall look into, ta muchly. And you ignored my Venom point because it wasn't valid... I didn't want to embarrass you with your own stupidity :roll: |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Stefan wrote: because it wasn't valid... I didn't want to embarrass you with your own stupidity :roll:
But you've said that, so you might as well finish... |
|
| Author: | lizardtail [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The best seventies punk band was King Crimson! Sex Pistols are actually terrible. I guess if you translated them into nowadays terms you'd get that new Darkthrone video. :twisted: :o :shock: 
|
|
| Author: | Stefan [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
lizardtail wrote: The best seventies punk band was King Crimson!
8) |
|
| Author: | Dead Machine [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Sex Pistols were only useful for their notoriety; everything else is crap. All they ever had was an overabundance of vitriol, and vitriol alone does not a good punk band make. Venom's more like Motorhead gone rawer, not really any Sex Pistols connection there. They do have an awesome name. |
|
| Author: | Metalhead_Bastard [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I...Hate this band-The Ramones and The Misfits are the punk bands that I really enjoy. |
|
| Author: | Goat [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dead Machine wrote: The Sex Pistols were only useful for their notoriety; everything else is crap. All they ever had was an overabundance of vitriol, and vitriol alone does not a good punk band make.
Venom's more like Motorhead gone rawer, not really any Sex Pistols connection there. They do have an awesome name. Sex Pistols = crap musicians with catchy songs Venom = crap musicians with crap songs Conclusion: Sex Pistols > Venom |
|
| Author: | lizardtail [ Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
best part of aforementioned dumb article about a terrible band: a brainy journalist wrote: A shortlist of nominees is sent to an international body of about 700 voting "rock experts".
where does one sign up to be a rock expert? do they mean geologist? |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|