T.I.E. wrote:
here's the rating system I use :
00-15 : awful
20-40 : poor
45-55 : average
60-70 : fair
75-85 : very good
90-95 : outstanding
99 : masterpiece
100 : perfection (this doesn't exist)
it's based on MR ratings but simplified... since I can't make a difference between 75 & 78, I use a 5 by 5 scale... and I never rate 100/100 thus I have a 99 for 'near perfect' albums...
too many people overrate albums, it's a shame because then you can't see the really good ones from the others... :?
I used something similar when reviewing. There is no way people can tell difference between 46 and 47, since the time and place you listened to the album can already make a 20 point difference in the first place. I used the metalreviews review scale, below 20 is rubbish, 20 and 25 are very bad, 30 and 35 are bad, 40 and 45 below average, 50 and 55 is mediocre, 60 and 65 is good, 70 and 75 is very good, 80 and 85 is outstanding, 90 and 95 is a masterpiece and 100/100 is legendary.