Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:04 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:24 pm
Posts: 796
Location: Detroit, MI
Hey Zad, may be you and some of the other reviewers here should consider making "updated" versions of old reviews. I mean, let's face it: Some of the earlier reviews on this site are borderline embarassing. It'd be cool to see improved versions of these reviews pop up every now and then.

On a side note, wasn't Danny also the guy that reviewed The Glorious Burden?

http://www.metalreviews.com/reviews/detail.php3?id=1967

Reading this review, I get the impression he deliberately looked for reasons to rip the album apart out of spite towards Jon Schaffer. Which is a big "no-no" when reviewing music.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:57 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
Add And Then You'll Beg to the list. It would become a crapshoot as to what needs replaced and who has the right to determine that (insert Ken :wink: ).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:00 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29799
Location: UK
Moved here from review thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:38 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Or maybe just delete the really bad ones like the Korn review.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:27 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:44 pm
Posts: 6817
Location: Florida
This site does need a bit of dusting up in the old corners of the site, like CLASSIC reviews that don't belong in the CLASSIC section, and some of those pretty embarassing older reviews. I'm with trapt, I don't know how to determine what gets replaced and how, but all I know is that something needs to get done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:32 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:24 am
Posts: 5454
Location: Oslo - Norway
We have discussed that, but the guys that have been here from the start wanted nothing of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:01 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:37 pm
Posts: 1046
Or maybe, like every other review site, allow multiple reviews for albums.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:53 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29799
Location: UK
Satan's Anus wrote:
Or maybe, like every other review site, allow multiple reviews for albums.


Well, not every other review site.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group