Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:38 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3847 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 ... 193  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:10 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Balls.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:18 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
UK national debt will pass a trillion Pounds today. We're spending more on paying off the interest than we are on defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:29 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:15 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Flanders, Southern Netherlands
Rule Britannia!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:56 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
Goat wrote:
UK national debt will pass a trillion Pounds today. We're spending more on paying off the interest than we are on defence.


So does China hold your debt too?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Just over 30% is held by "foreign investors" - whoever we can sell gilts to, really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:57 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Remarkably sensible article in the Telegraph about Egypt -

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peter ... -business/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:22 pm 
Offline
Metal Servant
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:32 am
Posts: 163
Location: Russia
It's not "our" (speaking from the perspective of the US/UK) business, because the current leadership is a "friend", even if it is a de facto dictatorship. As a friend of mine from a different forum put it:

Quote:
its pretty telling to see how the Iranian protests were treated compared to Egyptian protests. in the iranian protests, the state department intervened and convinced twitter to stay online for another couple days instead of doing an update, they were encouraged and praised by american officials, and given tons of time on the news. however, since egypt's dictator is friendly with the US and does what the US wants on the Israel-Palestine issue, then we want him to stay in.

it isnt any surprise that very few people in the middle east don't take the calls for democracy seriously by the US, because the only times the US actually cares about democracy is when it might weaken its enemies



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:00 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Quite.

Some pics - http://totallycoolpix.com/2011/01/the-egypt-protests/ (not all SFW)

There are some amazing stories leaking through on Twitter. Al Jazeera has good coverage - http://blogs.aljazeera.net/middle-east/ ... s-continue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:38 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:16 am
Posts: 1596
Location: Top of the food chain in Calgary, Canada
Goat wrote:


Amazing pics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:42 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

-T. Jefferson

How far we have strayed from the road laid by our Founding Fathers...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:25 pm 
Offline
Metal Servant
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:32 am
Posts: 163
Location: Russia
cry of the banshee wrote:
honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

-T. Jefferson

How far we have strayed from the road laid by our Founding Fathers...


Yeah, we've also abolished slavery.

Also, "honest friendship" is impossible in politics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:56 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
JokerMachine wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

-T. Jefferson

How far we have strayed from the road laid by our Founding Fathers...


Yeah, we've also abolished slavery.

Also, "honest friendship" is impossible in politics.


We abolished slavery? Really? Gee, you learn something new every day, I guess.
Yes, I am aware of that, but it is not germane to, well, anything really, and frankly it is a bore having that threadbare canard trotted out every single time Jeffersons name is mentioned.

You're not seeing the tree for the forest, or however it goes...
the obvious point of that quote is the avoidance of becoming involved with other nations government, or allying ourselves with them, while engaging in commerce.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:11 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
Anyway, this could be a good thing. I don't know that much about it, but apparently the Egyptian people (and the Yemen) live under some pretty harsh conditions, under a tinpot 30 year dicator.
But, the Islamic Revolution in Iran (this really does remind me of that in many ways) wasn't necessarilly good for the Iranian people.
As bad as the Shah was, is the Ayatollah any better?
A boot on your neck is still a boot on your neck, regardless of who is wearing it.
So, it could be for the worse, as well. I guess only time will tell.

Interesting that Mubarak himself refused to step down, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:14 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
cry of the banshee wrote:
JokerMachine wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

-T. Jefferson

How far we have strayed from the road laid by our Founding Fathers...


Yeah, we've also abolished slavery.

Also, "honest friendship" is impossible in politics.


We abolished slavery? Really? Gee, you learn something new every day, I guess.
Yes, I am aware of that, but it is not germane to, well, anything really, and frankly it is a bore having that threadbare canard trotted out every single time Jeffersons name is mentioned.

You're not seeing the tree for the forest, or however it goes...
the obvious point of that quote is the avoidance of becoming involved with other nations government, or allying ourselves with them, while engaging in commerce.


Jefferson's problem, whether he wanted to or not, was that he was just as capable as favoring the French as Hamilton was at favoring the British. Avoiding entangling alliances is sage advice, but early America was too weak not to lean pro-French or pro-British. Still, after the war of 1812 the US position was very safe on the continent, so the founders did something right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:16 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
cry of the banshee wrote:
Anyway, this could be a good thing. I don't know that much about it, but apparently the Egyptian people (and the Yemen) live under some pretty harsh conditions, under a tinpot 30 year dicator.
But, the Islamic Revolution in Iran (this really does remind me of that in many ways) wasn't necessarilly good for the Iranian people.
As bad as the Shah was, is the Ayatollah any better?
A boot on your neck is still a boot on your neck, regardless of who is wearing it.

So, it could be for the worse, as well. I guess only time will tell.

Interesting that Mubarak himself refused to step down, though.


Agreed. The Shah was just better for the West.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:23 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
emperorblackdoom wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Anyway, this could be a good thing. I don't know that much about it, but apparently the Egyptian people (and the Yemen) live under some pretty harsh conditions, under a tinpot 30 year dicator.
But, the Islamic Revolution in Iran (this really does remind me of that in many ways) wasn't necessarilly good for the Iranian people.
As bad as the Shah was, is the Ayatollah any better?
A boot on your neck is still a boot on your neck, regardless of who is wearing it.

So, it could be for the worse, as well. I guess only time will tell.

Interesting that Mubarak himself refused to step down, though.


Agreed. The Shah was just better for the West.

Yeah but he was bad for his own people.
My personal belief is that we should not interfere with other nations' governance, it always comes back to bite us on the ass.
The business of America should be doing business, nothing else outside of self-defense or defense of only our truest and staunchest allies (Britain, France, Australia, etc). and I mean only the tried and true, such as the ones I just named.
Those three (if I am neglecting the mention of anybody, my apologies) have always stood by us, and we should always do the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:30 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
cry of the banshee wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Anyway, this could be a good thing. I don't know that much about it, but apparently the Egyptian people (and the Yemen) live under some pretty harsh conditions, under a tinpot 30 year dicator.
But, the Islamic Revolution in Iran (this really does remind me of that in many ways) wasn't necessarilly good for the Iranian people.
As bad as the Shah was, is the Ayatollah any better?
A boot on your neck is still a boot on your neck, regardless of who is wearing it.

So, it could be for the worse, as well. I guess only time will tell.

Interesting that Mubarak himself refused to step down, though.


Agreed. The Shah was just better for the West.

Yeah but he was bad for his own people.
My personal belief is that we should not interfere with other nations' governance, it always comes back to bite us on the ass.
The business of America should be doing business, nothing else outside of self-defense or defense of only our truest and staunchest allies (Britain, France, Australia, etc). and I mean only the tried and true, such as the ones I just named.
Those three (if I am neglecting the mention of anybody, my apologies) have always stood by us, and we should always do the same.


I'd argue Canada has been a stauncher ally of ours than France, but point well-taken. One only needs to look at our dealings with US support of the Fundamentalists against the USSR in Afghanistan to see where US meddling his returned to punish us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:32 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
emperorblackdoom wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
JokerMachine wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

-T. Jefferson

How far we have strayed from the road laid by our Founding Fathers...


Yeah, we've also abolished slavery.

Also, "honest friendship" is impossible in politics.


We abolished slavery? Really? Gee, you learn something new every day, I guess.
Yes, I am aware of that, but it is not germane to, well, anything really, and frankly it is a bore having that threadbare canard trotted out every single time Jeffersons name is mentioned.

You're not seeing the tree for the forest, or however it goes...
the obvious point of that quote is the avoidance of becoming involved with other nations government, or allying ourselves with them, while engaging in commerce.


Jefferson's problem, whether he wanted to or not, was that he was just as capable as favoring the French as Hamilton was at favoring the British. Avoiding entangling alliances is sage advice, but early America was too weak not to lean pro-French or pro-British. Still, after the war of 1812 the US position was very safe on the continent, so the founders did something right.


Well, they were none of them perfect, and the quote is not perfect, either.
haveing allies and becoming entangled in their affairs are not precisely the same.
And I would like to ammend my comment above regarding alliances; we need allies, but the conditions of those alliances should be of a mutual nature, not self imposed, and not created exclusively toward dominating spheres of influence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:33 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
emperorblackdoom wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Anyway, this could be a good thing. I don't know that much about it, but apparently the Egyptian people (and the Yemen) live under some pretty harsh conditions, under a tinpot 30 year dicator.
But, the Islamic Revolution in Iran (this really does remind me of that in many ways) wasn't necessarilly good for the Iranian people.
As bad as the Shah was, is the Ayatollah any better?
A boot on your neck is still a boot on your neck, regardless of who is wearing it.

So, it could be for the worse, as well. I guess only time will tell.

Interesting that Mubarak himself refused to step down, though.


Agreed. The Shah was just better for the West.

Yeah but he was bad for his own people.
My personal belief is that we should not interfere with other nations' governance, it always comes back to bite us on the ass.
The business of America should be doing business, nothing else outside of self-defense or defense of only our truest and staunchest allies (Britain, France, Australia, etc). and I mean only the tried and true, such as the ones I just named.
Those three (if I am neglecting the mention of anybody, my apologies) have always stood by us, and we should always do the same.


I'd argue Canada has been a stauncher ally of ours than France, but point well-taken. One only needs to look at our dealings with US support of the Fundamentalists against the USSR in Afghanistan to see where US meddling his returned to punish us.

Yeah, Canada, too.
I knew I was forgetting someone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Mohammed El Baradei has joined protesters in Tahrir Square, where he's preparing to speak to the 100,000+ people there. Apparently the Muslim Brotherhood have agreed that the state set up after the revolution will not be based on religion. Am genuinely hopeful that they can institute a free and fair democracy - stories about how one religion defended another during friday prayers are wonderful to hear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3847 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 ... 193  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group