Brahm_K wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Seinfeld26 wrote:
Brahm_K wrote:
Cults are generally defined by their adherence to a living man and by the fact that they force you to contribute money in order to be a part of it. They also advocate complete separation from society and are generally outside the mainstream of their society. You'd be right to say that most religions start as cults, and that those cults that don't die out generally become religions, but there is a difference between developed religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism) and Jim Jones and co.
Cults also
force you to practice certain rituals, etc. in the name of whoever they're devoted to (sometimes with death as the only alternative). Religions, meanwhile, have traditional practices and beliefs. But also give you freedom to choose whether or not you wish to practice them.
Christianity / catholicism has some of the bloodiest hands in history; conversion by fire and sword, anybody? The Inquisition ring a bell?
We're talking modern definitions of religion here, man. If you're trying to argue that medieval Christianity was like a modern cult (a waste of time, because they are very different, just as medieval religion is very different from modern religion), then I don't get your point at all.
It figures you wouldn't. Who gets to define "modern definitions of religion"? Organized religion? How convenient.
All modern day religions started out as "cults", they flourished under the threat of punishment by torture and death, until, here we are modern day, where it is no longer necessary to threaten with torture and death.
The point is: it was stated that "cults" sometimes use force to coerce people to do things; I stated that organized religion (which were at one time "cults") used force to convert others, or in other words, "practice certain rituals"... So what is the difference between catholicism in it's salad days and your average run-of-the-mill cult? It withstood the trials of time; and no wonder; filling young childrens heads with fear of everlasting torment if you do not accept Jesus; fear has always been a very effective
method of indoctrination.
To state that "
cults force you to practice certain rituals, etc. in the name of whoever they're devoted to (sometimes with death as the only alternative). Religions, meanwhile, have traditional practices and beliefs. But also give you freedom to choose whether or not you wish to practice them." is ironic, to say the least.
Nobody FORCES anybody to join a cult, either.
My POINT is marginalizing certains beliefs as "cults" while validating Catholicism / Judaeo- Christianity /etc. as "religion" smacks of hypocrisy.